08.11.2012 Views

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. relocation committee reviews preliminary property matrix scoring;<br />

6. relocation committee discusses feasibility <strong>of</strong> subject property;<br />

7. comments from HHS and Planning staff, relocation committee, and others are forwarded<br />

to Bridge House site location team (board and Bridge House advisory members);<br />

8. Bridge House site location team determines next steps;<br />

9. Bridge House Public Relations Committee reviews each property for public relations<br />

concerns;<br />

10. relocation committee and staff provide additional information as needed; and<br />

11. feasible sites reviewed by full Bridge House Board for possible action.<br />

C. Zoning and Services Map - In order to identify and assess potential sites, a zoning and<br />

services map identifies zoning compatible for day shelters. The map also identifies: bus routes,<br />

agencies serving homeless and near-homeless, public facilities, schools, day cares, adjacent<br />

zoning and 600-foot buffer-zones surrounding parks, schools and child care centers (Attachment<br />

1).<br />

D. Property Assessment Matrix - Bridge House developed an assessment matrix that compares<br />

properties. Components <strong>of</strong> the matrix include: proximity to other services commonly used by<br />

Bridge House clientele, adequacy <strong>of</strong> the site’s size, compatible zoning, potential timing issues,<br />

cost per square foot, availability <strong>of</strong> financing, and affordability <strong>of</strong> property and potential<br />

neighborhood issues (Attachment 2). High scoring properties are referred to the Bridge House<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Directors for further evaluation.<br />

Previous Properties Considered<br />

A tour <strong>of</strong> ten properties deemed to be feasible and desirable took place in May 2011. Several <strong>of</strong><br />

these properties were evaluated further but are no longer being considered:<br />

1. 1724 Broadway<br />

The Bridge House Board determined this site was desirable and submitted a Conditional<br />

Use Review to the city. A “Good Neighbor” meeting, hosted by Bridge House Board and<br />

staff, was held on May 25, 2011. Community input included support and concerns <strong>of</strong><br />

safety related to the site’s proximity to <strong>Boulder</strong> High School. Subsequent to the meeting,<br />

the Bridge House Board <strong>of</strong> Directors opted not to pursue this site.<br />

2. 2805 Broadway<br />

No formal notice <strong>of</strong> interest was filed regarding this site. Informal communication from<br />

adjacent property owners indicated strong objection to this use and no further action has<br />

been taken.<br />

3. 2880 Diagonal<br />

This site, which was subject to a foreclosure action, was assessed and deemed desirable.<br />

The property was purchased through an auction in September 2011 by another party and<br />

is no longer under consideration.<br />

Information Item 2C Page 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!