Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ORDER OF BUSINESS<br />
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: - 7:20 p.m. - None.<br />
6. MATTERS FROM THE CITY MANAGER: - 7:21 p.m.<br />
A. UPDATE ON THE ROUND 2 CAPITAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY COMMITTEE<br />
PROCESS AND SCHEDULE.<br />
<strong>City</strong> Manager Brautigam provided the presentation on the item and shared some<br />
background information on Round 1 <strong>of</strong> the Capital Investment Committee. Round 1<br />
focused on using existing revenues. Round 2 would consider new revenue sources. The<br />
Committee would work to develop a bond package for consideration in 2012 that would<br />
raise new revenues to invest in capital projects that make <strong>Boulder</strong> “<strong>Boulder</strong>” and would<br />
include ongoing operation and maintenance costs to support those projects. Ms.<br />
Brautigam shared the Committee’s guiding principles, which included projects that focus<br />
on:<br />
� Further <strong>Boulder</strong>’s unique role and sense <strong>of</strong> place<br />
� Further economic, environmental, and social sustainability goals<br />
� Reflect community values<br />
� Benefit a broad cross-section <strong>of</strong> the community<br />
� Are shown in or will carry out goals in adopted plan<br />
� Provide greater efficiency in conducting the city’s business<br />
� Avoid higher cost investments later<br />
� Have a clear project scope and have been vetted<br />
� Address significant deficiencies<br />
� Add significant value or provide return on investment<br />
The timeline included a January 10 council check-in; mid-January public opinion poll<br />
results; a January 20-21 council retreat discussion; and, in February, the committee<br />
would seek council direction on whether to move forward in 2012 or pause for later<br />
consideration.<br />
Council Member <strong>Becker</strong> spoke to Denver’s bonding and the exciting projects that came<br />
out <strong>of</strong> their process including the Colorado History Museum. She commented that being<br />
visionary and thinking big would be important in this process.<br />
Council Member <strong>Karakehian</strong> asked whether money would stay in the specific categories<br />
<strong>of</strong> other projects that may drop <strong>of</strong>f. <strong>City</strong> Manager Brautigam indicated that money could<br />
be moved around but generally funds would not be used beyond what was set in the<br />
spreadsheet. Mr. <strong>Karakehian</strong> clarified that Round 2 would include projects that weren’t<br />
yet completed as well as new ideas/projects. He also clarified with the <strong>City</strong> Manager that<br />
two public opinion polls would occur throughout the process. He would also love to see<br />
what the questions will be prior to them going out to the public.<br />
November 15, 2011 4