01.01.2015 Views

The Khentkawes Town (KKT) - Ancient Egypt Research Associates

The Khentkawes Town (KKT) - Ancient Egypt Research Associates

The Khentkawes Town (KKT) - Ancient Egypt Research Associates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.aeraweb.org<br />

Burial 458 (Square 101.S–T28, Cut [30,102], Fill [30,103],<br />

[30,120], Skeleton [30,202]), Color Plate 5.2<br />

This burial was cut into wall feature #21876 and covered by<br />

a layer of limestone [30,120] that together weighed 143 kg. It<br />

is possible that there originally was more limestone covering<br />

the burial, since the body below the limestone layer had<br />

quite clearly been disturbed at some point, and the stones<br />

re-deposited. <strong>The</strong> individual in the burial was an adult, but<br />

sex could not be determined due to the fact that most of the<br />

skeleton was missing. Age assessment was based on epiphysial<br />

fusion. <strong>The</strong> lower portion of the body was truncated and the<br />

skeletal remains were missing. In the area where the legs would<br />

have been there was more pottery that in the rest of the fill,<br />

possibly remnants of a separate robbery cut. However, this<br />

was not recognized during excavation, and the fill under the<br />

stones was taken out as one feature [30,103]. No cranial bones<br />

or dentition was recovered, and no pathologies noted.<br />

Figure 52. Burial 458, Skeleton [30,202].<br />

Burial 459 (Square 101.U–V30, Cut [30,203], Fill [30,204], Skeleton<br />

[30,206]), Color Plate 6.1<br />

This burial cut truncated two walls: wall [29,957] and wall [21,909]. <strong>The</strong> burial<br />

had been almost completely “scooped out,” and only the lowest 2–3 cm of the<br />

bottom of the burial pit remained. This truncation most likely occurred during<br />

the Selim Hassan excavations in the 1930s. Of the skeleton, only a few fragments<br />

(~13) remained and no dentition was found. Determination of exact bone type of<br />

the fragments is awaiting final laboratory analysis. Age and sex assessment were<br />

impossible. No pathologies were noted.<br />

Figure 53. Burial 459,<br />

Skeleton [30,206].<br />

Giza Occasional Papers 4 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!