02.01.2015 Views

ANZCA Bulletin June 2011 - Australian and New Zealand College of ...

ANZCA Bulletin June 2011 - Australian and New Zealand College of ...

ANZCA Bulletin June 2011 - Australian and New Zealand College of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1: a suggested algorithm for the acute management <strong>of</strong> an obstructing airway.<br />

The patient’s preoperative<br />

assessment by the anaesthetist revealed<br />

that he was able to speak but had<br />

some limitation <strong>of</strong> his mouth opening.<br />

There was no stridor or drooling. The<br />

anaesthetist performed an awake<br />

fibreoptic intubation as a teaching<br />

exercise for the anaesthetic trainee.<br />

The anaesthetist felt that the patient’s<br />

clinical condition was not an indication<br />

for the awake fibreoptic intubation.<br />

The fibreoptic view revealed a normal<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the vocal cords.<br />

The surgeons drained a right<br />

subm<strong>and</strong>ibular <strong>and</strong> sublingual abscess.<br />

Following the surgical procedure, the<br />

anaesthetist examined the airway<br />

with a laryngoscope <strong>and</strong> could see<br />

his epiglottis <strong>and</strong> the posterior part <strong>of</strong><br />

his vocal cords. The anaesthetist was<br />

confident that he could re-intubate<br />

the patient if that was necessary. The<br />

patient was extubated <strong>and</strong> transferred<br />

to the recovery ward following the<br />

surgery.<br />

The anaesthetist reviewed the patient<br />

in the recovery ward at approximately<br />

5.30pm. At this time he was sitting<br />

upright in his bed <strong>and</strong> the anaesthetist<br />

asked him how he was going, to which<br />

he responded “fine”. The patient on<br />

direct questioning denied any pain.<br />

Despite this, the records show that<br />

the patient received 32 milligrams <strong>of</strong><br />

morphine in four milligram doses while<br />

in the recovery ward. The patient did not<br />

have any stridor. His tongue was slightly<br />

swollen. The anaesthetist then asked the<br />

consultant anaesthetist in charge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recovery ward to supervise the patient’s<br />

care. She reviewed him <strong>and</strong> discharged<br />

the patient to the general ward.<br />

After arrival in the ward at 6.10pm<br />

the nurse assisted the patient to have a<br />

shower <strong>and</strong> changed his dressing. She<br />

stated that he responded to her with yes<br />

or no answers but did not converse. The<br />

nursing observations were performed<br />

immediately after the patient’s arrival<br />

in the ward <strong>and</strong> then at 7pm <strong>and</strong><br />

8pm. These observations included<br />

temperatures, oxygen saturations <strong>and</strong><br />

blood pressure. The nurse also said the<br />

patient was alert <strong>and</strong> orientated at 8pm<br />

<strong>and</strong> he was given some morphine for<br />

pain relief.<br />

(continued next page)<br />

<strong>ANZCA</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!