03.01.2015 Views

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STEPHEN A. KISH<br />

Figure 1a. Rare earth chondrite normalized plot for C-10 granite. Chondrite normalization values from Henderson, 1984 (Table 1.5,<br />

Column 1).<br />

Figure 1b. Ocean ridge granite (ORG) normalized geochemical plot for the C-10 granite. Modified from Pearce and others, 1984.<br />

The elements Ta and Hf have been omitted from the plot.<br />

nearly constant 10x enrichment relative to a chondritic average<br />

(Fig. 1a).<br />

Trace element discrimination diagrams for granites<br />

(Pearce and others, 1984) can be utilized to evaluate the possible<br />

tectonic setting <strong>as</strong>sociated with granite formation. Utilizing<br />

these diagrams (e.g. Fig. 1b) the C-10 granite would<br />

be best characterized <strong>as</strong> a volcanic arc granite, however<br />

these diagrams are not unambiguous. For instance, post-collisional<br />

granites can have trace element signatures similar to<br />

volcanic arc granites.<br />

GEOCHRONOLOGY<br />

In order to place some limits on the age of the C-10<br />

granite, Rb-Sr isotopic analyses were performed on wholerock<br />

and pot<strong>as</strong>sium feldspar (Table 2). Both biotite (mostly<br />

chloritized) and plagiocl<strong>as</strong>e proved unsuitable for dating due<br />

to the highly altered nature of these minerals.<br />

A date obtained from a whole-rock and pot<strong>as</strong>sium feldspar<br />

pair yields a value of 220+4 Ma (2 sigma). Because the<br />

granite appears to have been metamorphosed and altered,<br />

this age does not represent the time crystallization. B<strong>as</strong>ed<br />

upon K-Ar and Rb-Sr dating studies of K-feldspar elsewhere<br />

in the Appalachians, this age may represent the time when<br />

the rock cooled to temperatures below 100 o – 150 o C. This<br />

condition could be <strong>as</strong>sociated with extensive erosion that<br />

took place following the end of Paleozoic orogenic activity.<br />

A whole-rock model age may be calculated for the sample.<br />

For such a calculation an <strong>as</strong>sumed initial 87 Sr/ 86 Sr value<br />

is used. For granitic rocks of the Piedmont (Fullagar, 1971;<br />

Fullagar and Butler, 1979; Kish, 1983) the most common<br />

range in 87 Sr/ 86 Sr initial ratio is 0.7040 to 0.7150. If the<br />

upper value (0.7150) is used in the age calculation a model<br />

age of 440 Ma is obtained; using the lower 87 Sr/ 86 Sr initial<br />

ratio the model age is 550 Ma. Since most granites in the<br />

Piedmont have relatively lo 87 Sr/ 86 Sr initial ratios, the<br />

older age (~550 Ma) is preferred <strong>as</strong> an estimate for the age of<br />

crystallization.<br />

Table 2. Rb-Sr isotopic data for core sample C-10-1734.<br />

Rb (ppm) Sr (ppm) 87 Rb/ 86 Sr 87 Sr/ 86 Sr<br />

Whole-rock 165.7 150.0 3.206 0.73826<br />

K-Feldspar 353.0 161.0 6.374 0.75474<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!