03.01.2015 Views

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (1.8 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY<br />

<strong>Guidebook</strong> for 1992 Annual Meeting<br />

Pages 71-76<br />

HYDROSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE REGION, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA<br />

Rolf K. Aadland 1 , Paul A. Thaye 2 , and Andrew D. Smits 3<br />

1 Environmental Sciences Section, SRTC, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., P.O. Box 616, Aiken South <strong>Carolina</strong> 29802<br />

2 Department of Earth Sciences, UNCW, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403-3297<br />

3 Science Applications International Corporation, 360 Bay Street, Suite 200, Augusta, GA 30901<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Numerous studies have described and modeled the<br />

hydrostratigraphy in and around the Savannah River Site<br />

(SRS) area (Siple, 1967; Colquhoun and others, 1983;<br />

Brooks and others, 1985; Clarke and others, 1985; Miller,<br />

1986; Aucott and others 1987; Aucott, 1988; Krause and<br />

Randolph, 1989). Central to all previous studies is the one to<br />

one correspondence between hydrostratigraphic units and<br />

lithostratigraphic units. This method is difficult to apply<br />

regionally owing to the abrupt facies changes in stratigraphic<br />

units of the updip Co<strong>as</strong>tal Plain sequence. For example,<br />

lithostratigraphic units included in aquifer and confining<br />

units at one location are often not present or are of different<br />

hydraulic character elsewhere.<br />

Detailed analysis of drill core, geophysical, and hydrologic<br />

data from 144 wells provides the b<strong>as</strong>is for a hydrostratigraphic<br />

cl<strong>as</strong>sification system of the SRS region (Figs. 1<br />

and 2) (Aadland and others, 1992a,b), which makes use of<br />

hydrologic properties, most significantly hydraulic conductivity,<br />

porosity, and specific storage. These criteria eliminate<br />

any “formal” reliance of the cl<strong>as</strong>sification scheme on lithology,<br />

age, geologic history, stratigraphic position or other feature.<br />

The resultant cl<strong>as</strong>sification scheme ranks<br />

hydrostratigraphic units at four levels, which from highest to<br />

lowest are (Aadland and others, 1992a,b): 1). Hydrogeologic<br />

province, 2). Hydrogeologic system, 3). Hydrogeologic unit,<br />

and 4). Hydrogeologic zone (informal).<br />

A hydrogeologic province is a major body of rock and/<br />

or sediment that behaves <strong>as</strong> a single hydrologic unit on a<br />

regional scale. Aquifer and confining systems may be composed<br />

of two or more aquifer and confining units that transmit<br />

(or impede) ground water on a regional b<strong>as</strong>is. Where<br />

aquifer systems coalesce, the unified aquifer system is<br />

named by hyphenating the names of the uppermost and lowermost<br />

constituent systems.<br />

An aquifer unit is mappable (>400mi 2 ) body of rock or<br />

sediment that is sufficiently permeable to conduct ground<br />

water and yield significant quantities of water to wells and<br />

springs (Burt, 1987a, b). A confining unit is a mappable<br />

body of rock or sediment of significantly lower hydraulic<br />

Figure 1. Generalized hydrostratigraphic cross-section of the SRS region.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!