10.01.2015 Views

CONFLICT BAROMETER 2008

CONFLICT BAROMETER 2008

CONFLICT BAROMETER 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 Conflict Barometer <strong>2008</strong><br />

Angola (FLEC/Cabinda)<br />

Intensity: 3 Change: Start: 1975<br />

Conflict parties: FLEC vs. government<br />

Conflict items: secession, resources<br />

The conflict between the Front for the Liberation of the<br />

Enclave of Cabinda - Armed Forces of Cabinda (FLEC-<br />

FAC) and the government about the future status of the<br />

oil-rich enclave of Cabinda remained violent. FLEC-FAC,<br />

a faction opposed to the 2006 Memorandum of Understanding<br />

between FLEC and the government, continued<br />

its hit-and-run attacks on government forces. On<br />

March 3, a Portuguese worker and three soldiers were<br />

killed in a FLEC-FAC ambush. Despite these incidents,<br />

implementation of the peace memorandum continued.<br />

António Bento Bembe, a former rebel leader and now<br />

chairman of the Cabindan Forum for Dialog (FCD), highlighted<br />

the integration of former FLEC fighters into the<br />

Angolan Armed Forces (AAF) and the National Police as<br />

well as the extension of the special status of Cabinda.<br />

By <strong>2008</strong>, 80 to 90 percent of former FLEC fighters had<br />

been demobilized or joined the army. (bs)<br />

Burundi (Hutu - Tutsi)<br />

Intensity: 2 Change: Start: 1962<br />

Conflict parties: various Hutu parties vs. various Tutsi parties<br />

Conflict items: national power<br />

For the third year running, the national power conflict between<br />

Hutu and Tutsi in Burundi was carried out without<br />

the use of violence. From 2005 on, the country was ruled<br />

by the former Hutu rebel movement National Council for<br />

the Defense of Democracy – Forces for the Defense of<br />

Democracy (CNDD-FDD). On 12/19/07, the UN political<br />

mission BINUB was extended until December <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

Meanwhile, the government lagged behind the scheduled<br />

creation of a transitional justice mechanism (a Truth<br />

and Reconciliation Commission and a Special Court)<br />

supposed to deal with the war crimes committed in the<br />

civil war. Following repeated pressure by the UN, the<br />

government announced in October that the process of<br />

popular consultations on transitional justice, financed by<br />

the UN, was to start in January 2009. With the integration<br />

of many former Hutu rebel combatants, the domination<br />

of the Tutsi ethnic group in the Burundian army was<br />

overcome. However, in <strong>2008</strong> still only a few Hutu senior<br />

officers held positions on decision-making levels of the<br />

army. In April, hundreds of Burundian soldiers scheduled<br />

for demobilization refused to complete the process<br />

over financial issues, questioning whether the legal ethnic<br />

quota of 50 percent Hutu and 50 percent Tutsi in the<br />

make-up of the Burundian army had been respected in<br />

the selection of those to be demobilized. On August 14,<br />

the UNHCR set up a pilot-project model village where<br />

formerly displaced Hutu and Tutsi were resettled side by<br />

side to seek reconciliation after decades of ethnic violence.<br />

More than 450,000 Burundian refugees returned<br />

home since 2002. Nevertheless, more than 100,000<br />

Burundian refugees still remained in Tanzania alone by<br />

mid-<strong>2008</strong>. According to the International Crisis Group,<br />

the peace process between the two ethnic groups might<br />

be threatened when the last active Hutu rebel group, the<br />

Palipehutu-FNL led by Agathon Rwasa, participates in<br />

the general elections in 2010, as the rebels remained<br />

opposed to the ethnic quota system in the political system<br />

and the army. In June <strong>2008</strong>, Palipehutu-FNL was<br />

denied recognition as a political party because of the<br />

ethnic reference in its name, in accordance with the Burundian<br />

constitution. The rebels dismissed the idea of<br />

a name change [→ Burundi (Palipehutu-FNL Rwasa)].<br />

In addition, the worsening situation between Hutu and<br />

Tutsi in the DR Congo raised fears of renewed ethnically<br />

motivated violence in Burundi, especially considering<br />

that Congolese Tutsi rebel leader Laurent Nkunda was<br />

also recruiting Burundian Tutsi fighters [→ DR Congo<br />

(CNDP)]. (hlm)<br />

Burundi (Palipehutu-FNL Rwasa)<br />

Intensity: 4 Change: Start: 2005<br />

Conflict parties: Palipehutu-FNL faction led by Agathon<br />

Rwasa vs. government<br />

Conflict items: national power<br />

The conflict concerning national power between the<br />

Hutu rebel movement Palipehutu-FNL, led by Agathon<br />

Rwasa, and the government of President Pierre Nkurunziza,<br />

also a Hutu, escalated. Sporadic fighting continued<br />

throughout the deadlocked negotiations on the implementation<br />

of the September 2006 ceasefire treaty during<br />

the first months of the year. In late December 2007 and<br />

early January, Rwasa’s forces attacked military positions<br />

in the province of Bubanza, displacing more than 8,000<br />

persons. In March, talks between the conflict parties in<br />

Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, focused on renewed participation<br />

of the rebels in the Joint Verification and Monitoring<br />

Mechanism (JVMM) they had left in July 2007,<br />

and on Rwasa’s return from his exile in Tanzania. Other<br />

unresolved issues were to be dealt with by a Political Directorate<br />

(PD) to be established by South African chief<br />

mediator Charles Nqakula, whose mandate had been<br />

extended in February against Palipehutu-FNL’s accusations<br />

of bias. The PD, comprised of representatives of<br />

both conflict parties as well as - among others - the AU,<br />

the EU, South Africa, and Tanzania, was established in<br />

spring. In March, the government and Palipehutu-FNL<br />

announced that negotiations would resume on April 1<br />

and be completed by July. However, the date passed<br />

without any talks having begun. Instead, fighting resumed<br />

in the capital, Bujumbura, in the night of April 16<br />

to 17. The rebels started shelling the capital with mortars<br />

in what the army described as a ”major attack”, claiming<br />

the lives of at least ten people. The next day, the army<br />

launched a counterattack, in which at least four soldiers<br />

and ten rebels died. According to Palipehutu-FNL, the<br />

army had started the fighting. Clashes in and outside<br />

the capital continued throughout April, killing more than<br />

30 people altogether. The UN and the USA strongly<br />

condemned the fighting, which the US blamed entirely<br />

on Palipehutu-FNL. Both urged Palipehutu-FNL to return<br />

to the JVMM. Early in May, Palipehutu-FNL proposed<br />

to resume ceasefire talks with the government in<br />

mid-May. At the same time, the army killed 50 rebels<br />

in the heaviest fighting since the rebel’s attack on Bujumbura,<br />

near Kabezi, 20 km south of the capital. Two

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!