10.01.2015 Views

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. Remarks on <strong>QCD</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Coulomb</strong> <strong>Gauge</strong> 19<br />

whereas approximate equality was found with a different method for the SU(2) group<br />

[CZ03]. In a second period of lattice calculations the eigenvalue spectrum of the Faddeev-<br />

Popov operator became the ma<strong>in</strong> topic of <strong>in</strong>vestigation. <strong>The</strong>re conf<strong>in</strong>ement is related to<br />

the near-zero eigenmodes of the Faddeev-Popov operator [GOZ05] <strong>and</strong> relations to the<br />

vortex conf<strong>in</strong>ement scenario are found.<br />

3.4 Quantisation of Maxwell theory<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g we will show how to formulate Yang-Mills theory <strong>in</strong> <strong>Coulomb</strong> gauge. It<br />

will make apparent how this approach provides access to the <strong>Coulomb</strong> potential of colour<br />

charges <strong>in</strong> an elegant way. For the sake of comparison with the Abelian case we beg<strong>in</strong> by<br />

quantis<strong>in</strong>g Maxwell theory <strong>in</strong> this gauge 1 .<br />

For the quantisation of gauge theories st<strong>and</strong>ard procedures are not applicable. Look<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at the theory of electromagnetism this becomes clear. <strong>The</strong> Lagrangian density of this field<br />

theory is given by<br />

L = − 1 4 F µνF µν + g 0 A µ j µ . (3.5)<br />

Here the four-current j µ = (ρ,j) is a function of the matter fields. Comput<strong>in</strong>g the conjugated<br />

momentum fields gives<br />

Explicitly they read<br />

Π µ =<br />

Impos<strong>in</strong>g usual rules of quantisation 2 , we set<br />

∂L<br />

∂(∂ 0 A µ ) . (3.6)<br />

Π 0 = 0 (3.7)<br />

Π i = F i0 . (3.8)<br />

[µ(x, t), ˆΠ ν (y, t)] = iδ ν µδ (3) (x − y) . (3.9)<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g this to (3.7) we have clearly a contradiction. Modified rules for quantisation<br />

with constra<strong>in</strong>ts are required. <strong>The</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of their formulation is due to Dirac [Dir].<br />

From the viewpo<strong>in</strong>t of Dirac quantisation, the choice of a gauge consists of the replacement<br />

of an arbitrary function by a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed one <strong>in</strong> the Hamiltonian. <strong>The</strong> gauge<br />

conditions can be classified <strong>in</strong>to three classes.<br />

• Class I: <strong>Gauge</strong> conditions <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g only A a k<br />

canonically conjugate momenta πk a.<br />

<strong>and</strong> their<br />

1 This chapter employs the conventions A.1 <strong>and</strong> B .<br />

2 A hat “ ˆ ” over a quantity is supposed to denote the associated operator.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!