10.01.2015 Views

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 6.1. Introduction<br />

<strong>The</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t of the model is Dyson’s equation for the full quark 6-po<strong>in</strong>t function<br />

G, <strong>in</strong> symbolic notation written as<br />

G = G 0 + G 0 KG . (6.1)<br />

Here G 0 is the disconnected three-quark propagator <strong>and</strong> K is the three-quark scatter<strong>in</strong>g<br />

kernel that conta<strong>in</strong>s all two- <strong>and</strong> three-particle irreducible graphs. <strong>The</strong> calculation of the<br />

three-quark wave function can be simplified enormously by two assumptions:<br />

• Neglect three body <strong>in</strong>teractions, i.e. all 3-particle irreducible contributions to the<br />

full 3-quark correlation function.<br />

• Assume that the 2-quark correlation functions can be approximated as a sum over<br />

separable 1 terms that are identified with products of diquark-quark vertex functions.<br />

We detail on the second po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> section 6.2. Reference [BCP89] reported a rudimentary<br />

study of this Faddeev equation <strong>and</strong> subsequently more sophisticated analyses have<br />

appeared. As already mentioned our approach is based on the one which was taken <strong>in</strong><br />

reference [Oet00].<br />

As po<strong>in</strong>ted out <strong>in</strong> chapter 5 diquarks do not survive as asymptotic states, the attraction<br />

between quarks <strong>in</strong> this channel grounds a picture of baryons <strong>in</strong> which two quarks are always<br />

correlated as a colour-¯3 diquark pseudoparticle, <strong>and</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is effected by the iterated<br />

exchange of roles between the byst<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong> diquark-participant quarks.<br />

It has become apparent that the dom<strong>in</strong>ant correlations for ground state octet <strong>and</strong><br />

decuplet baryons are scalar <strong>and</strong> axial-vector diquarks, primarily because the associated<br />

mass-scales are smaller than the masses of these baryons [Mar02] <strong>and</strong> the positive parity<br />

of the correlations matches that of the baryons. Both scalar <strong>and</strong> axial-vector diquarks<br />

provide attraction <strong>in</strong> the Faddeev equation; e.g., a scalar diquark alone provides for a<br />

bound octet baryon <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g axial-vector correlations reduces that baryon’s mass.<br />

With the retention of axial-vector diquark correlations a quantitative description of<br />

baryon properties is atta<strong>in</strong>able [OHAR98]. However, that possibility necessitates the <strong>in</strong>corporation<br />

of pseudoscalar meson loop contributions because a credible description of<br />

baryon properties is otherwise problematic. Such effects contribute materially: to baryon<br />

masses [H + 02, Tho84, YLTW01]; <strong>and</strong> charge <strong>and</strong> magnetic radii, <strong>and</strong> magnetic moments<br />

[HJLT00a, HJLT00b, LTY01].<br />

In the follow<strong>in</strong>g section we discuss the approximation for the two-quark correlation<br />

matrix. In 6.3 we <strong>in</strong>troduce those aspects of the Po<strong>in</strong>caré covariant Faddeev equations<br />

1 Separability means that the two-quark correlation matrix is not supposed to conta<strong>in</strong> products between<br />

the “<strong>in</strong>go<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>and</strong> “outgo<strong>in</strong>g” momenta.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!