10.01.2015 Views

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

The QCD Quark Propagator in Coulomb Gauge and - Institut für Physik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Quark</strong> Dyson-Schw<strong>in</strong>ger Equation 45<br />

4.6 Numerical results<br />

A description of the numerical methods can be found <strong>in</strong> appendix C. Parts of it apply also<br />

to calculations <strong>in</strong> the sections 4.3 <strong>and</strong> 5. All presented results are <strong>in</strong> the chiral limit. For the<br />

<strong>Coulomb</strong> str<strong>in</strong>g tension we employ the value as <strong>in</strong> section 4.4, namely σ c = 0.5476 GeV 2 .<br />

For non-vanish<strong>in</strong>g current quark mass no converg<strong>in</strong>g result could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Figure 4.3<br />

displays the propagator function B(p E , |p|) <strong>in</strong> dependence of the <strong>in</strong>frared regulator. As<br />

already experienced <strong>in</strong> our calculation with the time-time component of the gluon propagator<br />

only we observe a diverg<strong>in</strong>g behaviour. <strong>The</strong> same is true for the propagator function<br />

C(p E , |p|). <strong>The</strong> third propagator function A(p E , |p|) deviates only very slightly from its<br />

value when only the time-time components of the gluon propagator is kept. This already<br />

h<strong>in</strong>ts that the changes <strong>in</strong> the mass function are not sizeable. Indeed <strong>in</strong> the computed<br />

result, illustrated <strong>in</strong> the figures 4.5 <strong>and</strong> 4.6, no considerable <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the mass function<br />

compared to the case without transverse gluons <strong>and</strong> retardation is obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Also<br />

for all displayed functions we have a variation <strong>in</strong> the frequency coord<strong>in</strong>ate p E only up to<br />

the numerical accuracy. <strong>The</strong> p-axis is for all presented functions a symmetry axis. As a<br />

renormalisation po<strong>in</strong>t we choose (ν E , |ν|) = (20000GeV, 45000GeV). As <strong>in</strong> section 4.4 the<br />

results do not vary while <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the renormalisation po<strong>in</strong>t a few orders of magnitude.<br />

An <strong>in</strong>crease of the factor Z <strong>in</strong> the equations (4.43)-(4.45) on the percentage level<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases the mass function slightly but has no impact on the frequency dependence.<br />

Evidently with the current results for the quark Dyson-Schw<strong>in</strong>ger equation a realistic<br />

calculation <strong>and</strong> description of observables is not possible. Further progress <strong>in</strong> this direction<br />

has to come from a more realistic version of the quark-gluon vertex.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!