13.01.2015 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

international biennials, triennials, and so on. These exhibitions should not<br />

be mistaken for mere sites of self-presentation and glorification of the values<br />

of the art market. Rather, they try time and again to both create and demonstrate<br />

a balance of power between contradictory art trends, aesthetic attitudes,<br />

and strategies of representation—to give an idealized, curated image<br />

of this balance.<br />

The struggle against the power of ideology traditionally took the form<br />

of struggle against the power of the image. Anti-ideological, critical, enlightened<br />

thought has always tried to get rid of images, to destroy or, at least, to<br />

deconstruct them—with the goal of replacing images with invisible, purely<br />

rational concepts. The announcement made by Hegel that art is a thing of<br />

the past and that our epoch has become the epoch of the Concept was a<br />

proclamation of victory of the iconoclastic Enlightenment over Christian<br />

iconophilia. Of course, Hegel was right at the time to make this diagnosis,<br />

but he overlooked the possibility of conceptual art. Modern art has demonstrated<br />

time and again its power by appropriating the iconoclastic gestures<br />

directed against it and by turning these gestures into new modes of art production.<br />

The modern artwork positioned itself as a paradox-object also in this<br />

deeper sense—as an image and as a critique of the image at the same time.<br />

This has guaranteed art a chance of survival under the conditions of<br />

radical secularization and de-ideologization—in a perspective that goes far<br />

beyond that of being a mere commodity on the art market. Our allegedly<br />

postideological age also has its own image: the prestigious international exhibition<br />

as the image of the perfect balance of power. The desire to get rid of<br />

any image can be realized only through a new image—the image of a critique<br />

of the image. This fundamental figure—the artistic appropriation of iconoclasm<br />

that produces the paradox-objects we call modern works of art—is the<br />

subject, either directly or indirectly, of the essays that follow.<br />

8 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!