Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
international biennials, triennials, and so on. These exhibitions should not<br />
be mistaken for mere sites of self-presentation and glorification of the values<br />
of the art market. Rather, they try time and again to both create and demonstrate<br />
a balance of power between contradictory art trends, aesthetic attitudes,<br />
and strategies of representation—to give an idealized, curated image<br />
of this balance.<br />
The struggle against the power of ideology traditionally took the form<br />
of struggle against the power of the image. Anti-ideological, critical, enlightened<br />
thought has always tried to get rid of images, to destroy or, at least, to<br />
deconstruct them—with the goal of replacing images with invisible, purely<br />
rational concepts. The announcement made by Hegel that art is a thing of<br />
the past and that our epoch has become the epoch of the Concept was a<br />
proclamation of victory of the iconoclastic Enlightenment over Christian<br />
iconophilia. Of course, Hegel was right at the time to make this diagnosis,<br />
but he overlooked the possibility of conceptual art. Modern art has demonstrated<br />
time and again its power by appropriating the iconoclastic gestures<br />
directed against it and by turning these gestures into new modes of art production.<br />
The modern artwork positioned itself as a paradox-object also in this<br />
deeper sense—as an image and as a critique of the image at the same time.<br />
This has guaranteed art a chance of survival under the conditions of<br />
radical secularization and de-ideologization—in a perspective that goes far<br />
beyond that of being a mere commodity on the art market. Our allegedly<br />
postideological age also has its own image: the prestigious international exhibition<br />
as the image of the perfect balance of power. The desire to get rid of<br />
any image can be realized only through a new image—the image of a critique<br />
of the image. This fundamental figure—the artistic appropriation of iconoclasm<br />
that produces the paradox-objects we call modern works of art—is the<br />
subject, either directly or indirectly, of the essays that follow.<br />
8 9