Untitled

Notes
The Logic of Equal Aesthetic Rights
1. Alexandre Kojève, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, assembled by Raymond Queneau
(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980), pp. 5ff.
2. Ibid., pp. 258ff.
On the New
1. Kazimir Malevich, “On the Museum,” in Kazimir Malevich, Essays on Art, vol. 1
(New York: George Wittenborn, 1971), pp. 68–72.
2. K. Malevich, “A Letter from Malevich to Benois,” in Essays on Art, vol. 1, p. 48.
3. Søren Kierkegaard, Philosophische Brocken (Düsseldorf/Cologne: Eugen Diederichs
Verlag, 1960), pp. 34ff. Translated as Philosophical Fragments, ed. and trans. with intro.
and notes by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1998).
4. Douglas Crimp, On the Museum’s Ruins (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993),
p. 58.
5. Arthur Danto, After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 13ff.
6. Thierry de Duve, Kant after Duchamp (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998),
pp. 132ff.
7. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, vol. 1 (Frankfurt:
Suhrkamp Verlag, 1970), p. 25: “In allen diesen Beziehungen ist und bleibt die Kunst
nach der Seite ihrer höchsten Bestimmung für uns ein Vergangenes.”
8. See Boris Groys, “Simulated Readymades by Fischli/Weiss,” in Parkett, no. 40/41
(1994): 25–39.
On the Curatorship
1. Giorgio Agamben, Propfanierungen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005), p. 53.
2. Jacques Derrida, La dissémination (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1972), pp. 108f.