(EGM) Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia - Unido
(EGM) Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia - Unido
(EGM) Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia - Unido
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In conclusion, Frank Bartels suggested that key lessons for policy-makers<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded: i) be<strong>in</strong>g open to new approaches and <strong>in</strong>novative ideas; ii) seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ways to differentiate one self from others, <strong>in</strong> terms of FDI policies; iii)<br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g ways to better harness FDI <strong>in</strong>puts and generate synergies from<br />
these <strong>in</strong>puts; iv) adopt<strong>in</strong>g a holistic approach to <strong>in</strong>vestment promotion, and<br />
not focus<strong>in</strong>g exclusively on MNEs; and v) work<strong>in</strong>g to make the enabl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
environment conducive to all <strong>in</strong>vestors, through long-term strategies, rather<br />
than short-term palliatives, such as <strong>in</strong>centives.<br />
Research needs<br />
Stemm<strong>in</strong>g from the <strong>EGM</strong>, a number of issues were identified where the<br />
current body of knowledge is still relatively limited. These issues merit<br />
further and deeper empirical research and analysis, so as: i) to better<br />
understand their characteristics; and ii) thereby assist policy-makers to<br />
design new FDI policies and strategies appropriate for the foreign <strong>in</strong>vestment<br />
activity of today and tomorrow.<br />
There is def<strong>in</strong>itely a need to more clearly and accurately depict, and better<br />
understand, new dynamic trends with<strong>in</strong> the ‘<strong>in</strong>tegrated global factory’<br />
concept. Notably with regard to the emergence of looser and less vertically<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>ternational production networks, and what impact this is (or<br />
should be) hav<strong>in</strong>g on FDI promotion policy. For example, should policy-<br />
makers shift further away from conventional <strong>in</strong>vestment promotion policies,<br />
and design new strategies that are better tailored to meet the rise of the<br />
‘<strong>in</strong>tegrated global factory’? Indeed, to what extent is the conventional role of<br />
IPAs becom<strong>in</strong>g redundant, as the emphasis on FDI promotion shifts to a<br />
more holistic approach of improv<strong>in</strong>g the bus<strong>in</strong>ess-enabl<strong>in</strong>g environment, for<br />
domestic and foreign <strong>in</strong>vestors alike?<br />
A key miss<strong>in</strong>g element <strong>in</strong> our current body of knowledge are the FDI (and<br />
possibly FPI) aspects of global value (and supply) cha<strong>in</strong>s, which serve to<br />
<strong>in</strong>ter-connect the nodal po<strong>in</strong>ts of the ‘<strong>in</strong>tegrated global factory’. Until<br />
recently, global value and supply cha<strong>in</strong>s have not been viewed through the<br />
47