Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 44<br />
The above list compares the approved hotel and the proposed one with the most<br />
significant difference being that the bedrooms no longer include en-suite bathrooms,<br />
which have been replaced by the provision of communal washing facilities and toilets<br />
on each floor. Also, the ground floor residents lounge, which was served by a kitchen<br />
that would afford residents the provision of food and drink, has been removed in place<br />
of small communal lounge areas on each floor.<br />
It is suggested by GBC Private Housing Manager that the premises may be classified<br />
as a House in Multiple Occupation. This stance is resolved partly by the fact that there<br />
is “a lack of adequate and sufficient basic services, specifically the lack of provision for<br />
meals and dining arrangements and sufficient basic bathroom amenities”. However,<br />
notwithstanding this comment, the argument to be assessed under this application is<br />
whether or not this revised means of accommodation would justify refusal of the<br />
application in planning terms.<br />
To that end it is questioned whether the deletion of en-suite bathrooms would have a<br />
significant impact in planning terms, and also in terms of defining the building as a<br />
hostel rather than a hotel. This is very much an internal arrangement and would not, for<br />
example, exacerbate concerns over disturbance to the neighbouring residents.<br />
Similarly, whilst the provision of small residents lounges may not be fundamental to the<br />
issue of whether the accommodation proposed is a hotel or a hostel, this does raise<br />
some planning concern over the potential impact upon adjoining residents. This matter,<br />
and the potential harm it may cause, is explored in more detail in the following section.<br />
For the purposes of this section however, it is resolved that the level of accommodation<br />
being proposed under application 20090347 is still a hotel falling within Use Class C1<br />
of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987.<br />
In considering this resolution it is of interest to refer to a chain of hotels found within<br />
England and Europe known as Formula 1 Hotels. The level of accommodation<br />
provided in these premises is very similar to that being proposed under this current<br />
application and research indicates that it provides clean and cheap overnight<br />
accommodation.<br />
Impacts upon adjoining residents<br />
The first and perhaps most obvious issue to consider with regards to the impact of this<br />
proposal is on the adjoining properties relates to potential disturbance caused by<br />
residents coming, going and generally using the hotel and its facilities. In order to<br />
respect the amenity of the adjoining residents a condition can be imposed on any grant<br />
of consent to ensure that the noise emitted from the building shall not exceed the<br />
existing background noise level by more than 3dB, as determined at the nearest<br />
residential premises. However, a condition is not reasonable if it were to restrict the<br />
hours that vehicles could enter and leave the premises. Given the location of the site<br />
within close proximity to Gravesend Town Centre, and its current authorised use as an<br />
office block, some disruption will currently exist and this should not be significantly<br />
worsened by this proposal.<br />
It is noted that this proposal, unlike the previous consent under reference 20080087,<br />
does not include a residents lounge at ground floor level, but it does comprise<br />
communal residents lounges on each of the upper floors. This has the potential to<br />
raise additional concerns over amenity due to the presence of what will be 5no.<br />
residents lounges rather than one. Due to the restricted size of these communal<br />
REPORT NO 7 PAGE 12