16.01.2015 Views

Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council

Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council

Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 45<br />

residents lounges it is likely that they will be furnished with televisions and audio<br />

systems to provide entertainment to the residents, which would have obvious potential<br />

to cause disturbance from amplified sound and people noise to nearby residents,<br />

particularly when the large windows are open. This concern is exacerbated by the<br />

potential for this premises to accommodate a greater number of residents over and<br />

above the proposed hotel use. The above referred condition controlling noise emitted<br />

from the premises relates to fixed plant and machinery noise.<br />

This matter has been raised with the <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Senior Environmental Health<br />

Officer and it was commented that whilst there may exist the potential for some<br />

disturbance through this arrangement, the concern is not so obvious that the use<br />

should be resisted on this ground. It was acknowledged though that should this matter<br />

become a problem and give rise to complaints by neighbouring residents that it can be<br />

controlled by statutory nuisance legislation.<br />

Due to the omission in this application of a residents lounge with provisions for food<br />

and drink, it would not be necessary to impose a planning condition restricting the use<br />

of the hotel facilities to residents only. This matter was addressed under the previous<br />

hotel consent as it was providing communal ground floor eating/drinking facilities which<br />

would have had the potential to attract its own customers which may have created<br />

additional movements and disturbance as people come and go.<br />

Secondly, there is the impact that this proposal will have on the adjoining properties in<br />

respect of overlooking. Whilst it is appreciated that this situation currently exists with<br />

the buildings permitted use as offices, such occupation is principally during the working<br />

day rather than in the evenings and weekends. The introduction of a hotel will<br />

generally alter this situation with the majority of visitors occupying the rooms in the<br />

evenings and at weekends.<br />

This matter was addressed in the previous consent for a hotel by the imposition of a<br />

planning condition that required the installation of external louvre style blinds over<br />

each window opening before the use is first commenced. It is therefore considered that<br />

an identical approach would be reasonable under this application if Members are<br />

minded to approve the application.<br />

Highways Matters<br />

Comments made by Kent Highways Services suitably cover the highways assessment<br />

of this scheme. It is important to note the comment regarding the deletion of the<br />

previously proposed coach lay by on the Windmill Street frontage. The general<br />

comment in this respect is that, due to the limited demand for such a facility, it is not<br />

essential and may in fact create more problems in terms of highway safety and also<br />

unauthorised use by general vehicles, which would be difficult to control.<br />

Secondly, the comment regarding re-aligning parking spaces 14 and 15 can be<br />

required through condition if Members are minded to approve this application.<br />

The proposal also requires the loss of the existing lay by in Zion Place. Whilst there is<br />

no objection to the loss of this facility due to the level of on site provision for access<br />

and turning, on balance the preference would be to retain this facility. It is recognised<br />

by highway officers that the likelihood for this facility to generate significant coach<br />

movements is limited, but this existing smaller lay by could provide a useful dropping<br />

off area for cars and/or taxis. It has been confirmed by the applicant that should<br />

Members prefer to see this facility retained then the scheme can be amended to<br />

REPORT NO 7 PAGE 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!