Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
Public reports pack PDF 9 MB - Gravesham Borough Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 45<br />
residents lounges it is likely that they will be furnished with televisions and audio<br />
systems to provide entertainment to the residents, which would have obvious potential<br />
to cause disturbance from amplified sound and people noise to nearby residents,<br />
particularly when the large windows are open. This concern is exacerbated by the<br />
potential for this premises to accommodate a greater number of residents over and<br />
above the proposed hotel use. The above referred condition controlling noise emitted<br />
from the premises relates to fixed plant and machinery noise.<br />
This matter has been raised with the <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Senior Environmental Health<br />
Officer and it was commented that whilst there may exist the potential for some<br />
disturbance through this arrangement, the concern is not so obvious that the use<br />
should be resisted on this ground. It was acknowledged though that should this matter<br />
become a problem and give rise to complaints by neighbouring residents that it can be<br />
controlled by statutory nuisance legislation.<br />
Due to the omission in this application of a residents lounge with provisions for food<br />
and drink, it would not be necessary to impose a planning condition restricting the use<br />
of the hotel facilities to residents only. This matter was addressed under the previous<br />
hotel consent as it was providing communal ground floor eating/drinking facilities which<br />
would have had the potential to attract its own customers which may have created<br />
additional movements and disturbance as people come and go.<br />
Secondly, there is the impact that this proposal will have on the adjoining properties in<br />
respect of overlooking. Whilst it is appreciated that this situation currently exists with<br />
the buildings permitted use as offices, such occupation is principally during the working<br />
day rather than in the evenings and weekends. The introduction of a hotel will<br />
generally alter this situation with the majority of visitors occupying the rooms in the<br />
evenings and at weekends.<br />
This matter was addressed in the previous consent for a hotel by the imposition of a<br />
planning condition that required the installation of external louvre style blinds over<br />
each window opening before the use is first commenced. It is therefore considered that<br />
an identical approach would be reasonable under this application if Members are<br />
minded to approve the application.<br />
Highways Matters<br />
Comments made by Kent Highways Services suitably cover the highways assessment<br />
of this scheme. It is important to note the comment regarding the deletion of the<br />
previously proposed coach lay by on the Windmill Street frontage. The general<br />
comment in this respect is that, due to the limited demand for such a facility, it is not<br />
essential and may in fact create more problems in terms of highway safety and also<br />
unauthorised use by general vehicles, which would be difficult to control.<br />
Secondly, the comment regarding re-aligning parking spaces 14 and 15 can be<br />
required through condition if Members are minded to approve this application.<br />
The proposal also requires the loss of the existing lay by in Zion Place. Whilst there is<br />
no objection to the loss of this facility due to the level of on site provision for access<br />
and turning, on balance the preference would be to retain this facility. It is recognised<br />
by highway officers that the likelihood for this facility to generate significant coach<br />
movements is limited, but this existing smaller lay by could provide a useful dropping<br />
off area for cars and/or taxis. It has been confirmed by the applicant that should<br />
Members prefer to see this facility retained then the scheme can be amended to<br />
REPORT NO 7 PAGE 13