17.01.2015 Views

Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE

Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE

Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Educational Development Index<br />

Part V<br />

large, it is higher in Upper Primary level compared to<br />

Primary level. The same was also observed in the case<br />

of smaller states and states in the north-eastern region.<br />

infrastructure index in Upper Primary level of education.<br />

On the other hand, with regard to teacher index, Assam<br />

(<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.328), Bihar (<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.334) and Jharkhand (<strong>EDI</strong>,<br />

Figure 5.5<br />

<strong>EDI</strong> at Primary & Upper Primary Level, Ten Bottom Ranked States: 2007-08<br />

The next sets of indicators that have been discussed<br />

fall under the category of teacher<br />

and outcome indicators. By and<br />

large, Kerala, Delhi and Tamil<br />

Nadu maintained their high<br />

rankings with regard to teachers’<br />

index at Primary level which is<br />

also true for Upper Primary level<br />

of education. Gujarat is ranked<br />

fourth at Primary and fifth at<br />

Upper Primary level which is in<br />

line with its over all ranking in<br />

composite Primary and Upper<br />

Primary index. Kerala with an <strong>EDI</strong><br />

of 0.950, both at the Primary and<br />

Upper Primary levels, is ranked<br />

first so far as teachers’ index is<br />

concerned. Kerala is followed by<br />

Delhi (<strong>EDI</strong> 0.937; rank 2 nd ) and Tamil Nadu (<strong>EDI</strong> 0.811;<br />

rank 3rd) at the Primary level which is also true for<br />

“Analysis of the <strong>EDI</strong> clearly<br />

reveals that different states<br />

are at different levels of<br />

educational development in<br />

general, and Primary and<br />

Upper Primary levels of<br />

education in particular. A few<br />

states with high <strong>EDI</strong> values<br />

are termed better than the<br />

rest of the states but still<br />

they may not be well placed<br />

with regard to all the four<br />

sets of indicators used in<br />

computation of the <strong>EDI</strong>”<br />

0.379) are respectively placed at 21 st , 20 th and 19 th<br />

position. In view of low <strong>EDI</strong><br />

values, they need significant<br />

improvement in most of their<br />

teacher related indictors.<br />

Further, it is observed that in<br />

most of the 21 major states,<br />

teachers’ index is observed to be<br />

higher for Upper Primary level<br />

compared to Primary level.<br />

However, the same is not true<br />

for outcome index, consisting of<br />

GER, examination results, GPI,<br />

dropout and repetition rates, etc.<br />

Karnataka is ranked first with an<br />

<strong>EDI</strong> value as high as 0.880 at<br />

Primary level and is ranked<br />

second (<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.819) at Upper<br />

Primary level of education. It may be noted that its<br />

ranking in access, infrastructure and teachers indices is<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!