Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE
Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE
Teacher Related Indicators & EDI - DISE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Educational Development Index<br />
Part V<br />
large, it is higher in Upper Primary level compared to<br />
Primary level. The same was also observed in the case<br />
of smaller states and states in the north-eastern region.<br />
infrastructure index in Upper Primary level of education.<br />
On the other hand, with regard to teacher index, Assam<br />
(<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.328), Bihar (<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.334) and Jharkhand (<strong>EDI</strong>,<br />
Figure 5.5<br />
<strong>EDI</strong> at Primary & Upper Primary Level, Ten Bottom Ranked States: 2007-08<br />
The next sets of indicators that have been discussed<br />
fall under the category of teacher<br />
and outcome indicators. By and<br />
large, Kerala, Delhi and Tamil<br />
Nadu maintained their high<br />
rankings with regard to teachers’<br />
index at Primary level which is<br />
also true for Upper Primary level<br />
of education. Gujarat is ranked<br />
fourth at Primary and fifth at<br />
Upper Primary level which is in<br />
line with its over all ranking in<br />
composite Primary and Upper<br />
Primary index. Kerala with an <strong>EDI</strong><br />
of 0.950, both at the Primary and<br />
Upper Primary levels, is ranked<br />
first so far as teachers’ index is<br />
concerned. Kerala is followed by<br />
Delhi (<strong>EDI</strong> 0.937; rank 2 nd ) and Tamil Nadu (<strong>EDI</strong> 0.811;<br />
rank 3rd) at the Primary level which is also true for<br />
“Analysis of the <strong>EDI</strong> clearly<br />
reveals that different states<br />
are at different levels of<br />
educational development in<br />
general, and Primary and<br />
Upper Primary levels of<br />
education in particular. A few<br />
states with high <strong>EDI</strong> values<br />
are termed better than the<br />
rest of the states but still<br />
they may not be well placed<br />
with regard to all the four<br />
sets of indicators used in<br />
computation of the <strong>EDI</strong>”<br />
0.379) are respectively placed at 21 st , 20 th and 19 th<br />
position. In view of low <strong>EDI</strong><br />
values, they need significant<br />
improvement in most of their<br />
teacher related indictors.<br />
Further, it is observed that in<br />
most of the 21 major states,<br />
teachers’ index is observed to be<br />
higher for Upper Primary level<br />
compared to Primary level.<br />
However, the same is not true<br />
for outcome index, consisting of<br />
GER, examination results, GPI,<br />
dropout and repetition rates, etc.<br />
Karnataka is ranked first with an<br />
<strong>EDI</strong> value as high as 0.880 at<br />
Primary level and is ranked<br />
second (<strong>EDI</strong>, 0.819) at Upper<br />
Primary level of education. It may be noted that its<br />
ranking in access, infrastructure and teachers indices is<br />
209