- Page 1 and 2: government 2.0 taskforce Engage <st
- Page 3 and 4: The Hon. Lindsay Tanner, MP Ministe
- Page 5: What’s in a name
‘Engage’
- Page 9 and 10: 6 Open government — policy enable
- Page 11 and 12:
Boxes Box 1: New APSC guideline
- Page 13 and 14: Executive summary Web 2.0 and its p
- Page 15 and 16: The National Library of Australia (
- Page 17 and 18: ●● properly documented and ther
- Page 19 and 20: Report recommendations Central reco
- Page 21 and 22: Recommendation 6: Make public secto
- Page 23 and 24: 7.2 The functions currently perform
- Page 25 and 26: 11.2 To protect the commercial-in-c
- Page 27 and 28: 1 What is Government 2.0 Being trul
- Page 29 and 30: 1.3.1 What is Web 2.0 Until recentl
- Page 31 and 32: 2 How does Australia compare intern
- Page 33 and 34: Within the context of Government 2.
- Page 35 and 36: The project will develop recommenda
- Page 37 and 38: Some states and local governments h
- Page 39 and 40:
electronic communications. It w
- Page 41 and 42: More recent developments include:
- Page 43 and 44: 3 The foundations of Government 2.0
- Page 45 and 46: Box 2: Permissions, information inn
- Page 47 and 48: Adam Smith and his intellectual des
- Page 49 and 50: 1. A Government 2.0 lead agency sho
- Page 51 and 52: 3.5.2 The lead agency as an exempla
- Page 53 and 54: The use of the internet as a platfo
- Page 55 and 56: My Museum was part of the stage two
- Page 57 and 58:
4.4 Connecting people, problems and
- Page 59 and 60:
Human Rights consultation: 156 The
- Page 61 and 62:
of aptitude and contribution in the
- Page 63 and 64:
In this regard Andrea Di Maio’s w
- Page 65 and 66:
create new engagement/participation
- Page 67 and 68:
●● collaborative filtering ●
- Page 69 and 70:
In June 2009, the site had 25,000 p
- Page 71 and 72:
than marginal cost of transfer in o
- Page 73 and 74:
Since 2007, the NLA has had histori
- Page 75 and 76:
Box 12: Reducing metadata paralysis
- Page 77 and 78:
A federal department was well dispo
- Page 79 and 80:
cost, that the center of innovation
- Page 81 and 82:
have passed. 227 At the same time,
- Page 83 and 84:
According to the Copyright Act 1968
- Page 85 and 86:
6.7 Copyright policy should be amen
- Page 87 and 88:
will have to be found. Those in cha
- Page 89 and 90:
with the scheme’s requirements. T
- Page 91 and 92:
Recommendation 8: Information publi
- Page 93 and 94:
●● ●● In some cases agencie
- Page 95 and 96:
Following are some relevant extract
- Page 97 and 98:
6.4 Information/records management
- Page 99 and 100:
Wider use of open and documented st
- Page 101 and 102:
As Open Forum noted in its submissi
- Page 103 and 104:
7 Innovation and the taskforce expe
- Page 105 and 106:
Even in the short period of its exi
- Page 107 and 108:
The Economics and Research team fro
- Page 109 and 110:
7.4 The taskforce and PSI 7.4.1 Mas
- Page 111 and 112:
The taskforce funded 17 projects an
- Page 113 and 114:
Appendices A Terms of reference
- Page 115 and 116:
Terms of reference (see numbers abo
- Page 117 and 118:
appropriate to the Web 2.0 environm
- Page 119 and 120:
Project 15: ALRC family violence co
- Page 121 and 122:
●● ●● ●● ●● ●
- Page 123 and 124:
●● ●● ●● ●● ●●
- Page 125 and 126:
Concern: Enforcement 338 Explanatio
- Page 127 and 128:
products and data, and the implemen
- Page 129 and 130:
Freemium GovHack Hacking Hashta
- Page 131 and 132:
Structured data Syndication Twe
- Page 133 and 134:
OSDM PSI PSM RDF SBS SEC TCC The Fe