20.01.2015 Views

Increasing access to energy services in rural areas - REEEP ...

Increasing access to energy services in rural areas - REEEP ...

Increasing access to energy services in rural areas - REEEP ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MODULE 10: INCREASING ACCESS TO ENERGY SERVICES IN RURAL AREAS<br />

page 10.65<br />

3. The NPV of the <strong>to</strong>tal subsidy is divided by the <strong>to</strong>tal number of benefit po<strong>in</strong>ts that have<br />

accrued, giv<strong>in</strong>g a cost per benefit po<strong>in</strong>t of the project.<br />

Once projects have been selected and packaged for development by the M<strong>in</strong>istry of Energy<br />

and/or the REA (or other appropriate body) the real prioritization will depend on the<br />

response and on specific requirements from private <strong>in</strong>ves<strong>to</strong>rs and the f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g are examples of criteria that can be used for further analysis and prioritization:<br />

4. Capital Cost per Connection analysis does not take <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account the Life Cycle Cost<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(LCC) or overall project viability, so projects, which could well, be viable may still show<br />

the highest Capital Cost per Connection. This approach <strong>to</strong> prioritization is thus very limited.<br />

5. Subsidy Analysis takes <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> account the full LCC and O&M costs, as well as determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

the subsidy that which will result <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g tariffs at affordable levels. Projects that<br />

require no subsidy are clearly favoured over those requir<strong>in</strong>g large subsidy. The Subsidy<br />

Required per Connection shows clearly which projects are most viable and which are<br />

not, but does not always clearly rank the projects.<br />

6. Benefit Po<strong>in</strong>ts Analysis gives a more useful overall rank<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

7. If projects do not fit with<strong>in</strong> these Benefit Po<strong>in</strong>t Analysis Criteria, then it is possible that<br />

some of the less economical l<strong>in</strong>es or components would have <strong>to</strong> be excluded from the<br />

project.<br />

8. A further criterion for rank<strong>in</strong>g would be that projects must have a m<strong>in</strong>imum number of<br />

BPs <strong>to</strong> be considered. If this were not done, large numbers of applications <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

many t<strong>in</strong>y projects may result <strong>in</strong> the larger projects be<strong>in</strong>g neglected.<br />

Step 5: Regional equity adjustment<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the prioritization of projects, the rank<strong>in</strong>gs could then be adjusted depend<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

other external <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g criteria:<br />

• Fund<strong>in</strong>g contributions from non-government sources;<br />

• Transmission grid and distribution network transfer capacity and security of supply;<br />

• Supply capacity available, scheduled load-shedd<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

• Generation capacity expansion programmes;<br />

• Grid and network expansion programmes;<br />

• Distributed (“<strong>in</strong>-project”) electricity generation;<br />

• Respective proportions of costs of transmission/distribution re<strong>in</strong>forcement and reticulation;<br />

• Political expectations;<br />

• Poverty alleviation policy and projects;<br />

• Regional equity (see further comments below).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!