India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction
India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction
India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Feature<br />
Major projects stuck for moef nod<br />
Coal Insights Bureau<br />
The delays in getting timely environmental<br />
and forestry clearances from the Ministry of<br />
Environment and Forest (MoEF) during the past five<br />
to six years has not only affected a number of greenfield<br />
projects in the <strong>coal</strong> sector, but in the aluminium, steel and<br />
power sectors as well.<br />
Not only it was Vedanta Resources, whose clearance<br />
of a bauxite mining was cancelled in August this year by<br />
MoEF, but its prior approval for a six-fold expansion of a<br />
refinery in Orissa too was suspended.<br />
Earlier, Supreme Court had barred public sector<br />
undertaking, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Ltd<br />
(KIOCL), from mining of iron ore from hills of Kudremukh<br />
citing environmental degradation. Tata Steel’s Gopalpur<br />
steel project too was delayed to great extent because of<br />
clearance related issues along with land acquisition<br />
problems.<br />
In addition, the ministry has delayed clearance to<br />
Pohang Iron and Steel Company’s (POSCO) ambitious<br />
project to set up a 12 million tons per annum integrated<br />
steel plant near the port town of Paradip, some 100 km<br />
from Bhubaneswar, citing various violations, including<br />
the Forest Rights Act. POSCO has proposed an investment<br />
of about $12 billion for the project.<br />
NTPC’s Loharinag Para hydel project (2 x 600 MW) too<br />
was cancelled on environmental issues, while a number<br />
of hydel projects in North Eastern part of India had either<br />
been delayed significantly or cancelled due to the same<br />
reason.<br />
On October 12, a delegation from Arunachal Pradesh<br />
took up with External Affairs Minister S M Krishna<br />
about his cabinet colleague Jairam Ramesh pitching for a<br />
moratorium on clearance for hydel projects in the state.<br />
The delegation led by Lok Sabha member Takam<br />
Sanjoy called on Krishna in New Delhi and sought his<br />
intervention, official sources in Itanagar said.<br />
Ramesh, the Union Environment and Forest minister,<br />
had recently taken up with the Prime Minister demands<br />
for review of all hydro projects in the Northeast and a<br />
moratorium on further clearances for hydel projects in<br />
Arunachal Pradesh saying these were bound to be the<br />
subject of agitation in Assam.<br />
The delegation apprised Krishna about the impact on<br />
Arunachal Pradesh if development and exploitation of its<br />
natural resources was halted, media reports said.<br />
Instead of protesting construction of a dam over<br />
Yrlang and Sangpo rivers on the Chinese side, Ramesh<br />
was trying to halt development in the state, the report said<br />
quoting the delegates.<br />
In another instance, MoEF has asked Jharkhand<br />
government to crack down on alleged illegal bauxite<br />
mines supplying the material the Vedanta Aluminium<br />
Ltd.<br />
Alleging that 11 out of these 14 mines are operating<br />
without prior environmental clearance, the ministry has<br />
shot off a letter to the Chief Secretary of Jharkhand, asking<br />
for corrective action.<br />
“Most of the mines in question appear to be operating<br />
under the deemed renewal. As per the directions of the<br />
Supreme Court of India and the clarification issue by the<br />
MoEF dated July 2, 2007, all such projects which have<br />
been operating without any environmental clearance<br />
would obtain environmental clearance at the time of their<br />
renewal of their mining lease”, said the MoEF letter to the<br />
Jharkhand Chief Secretary.<br />
“In view of the above, it is requested that all the<br />
concerned departments may be directed that the<br />
project proponent of the concerned mines shall obtain<br />
environmental clearance at the time of renewal of mine<br />
lease under the provisions of Environment Impact<br />
Assessment (EIA) Notification of 2006. Else, punitive<br />
action will need to be taken under the Environment<br />
Protection Act, 1986 for violating the EIA Notification of<br />
2006”, the letter added.<br />
However, in Rajasthan the state government has<br />
refused to cancel new mining leases in the Sariska range<br />
despite Union forests minister Jairam Ramesh asking<br />
chief minister Ashok Gehlot to put an end to mining in<br />
the Aravali ranges and cancel all new leases. The Supreme<br />
Court had earlier ruled: “no mining in Aravalis till further<br />
orders”.<br />
The mines department of Rajasthan said the order of<br />
the Suprement Court passed on February 2, 2010 is being<br />
fully implemented.<br />
“The court has restrained mining in cases of such mines<br />
where the renewal application is pending but lessees are<br />
doing mining as per the deeming provisions of rule 24A<br />
of Mineral Conservation Rules, 1960. The mining in such<br />
cases has been stopped completely,” a letter from mines<br />
department of Rajasthan said.<br />
More than 17 mines in and around Aravalis region are<br />
facing closure threat because of Supreme Court order.<br />
COAL INSIGHTS 40 October 2010