21.01.2015 Views

India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction

India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction

India's largest coal handling agency - Mjunction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feature<br />

Major projects stuck for moef nod<br />

Coal Insights Bureau<br />

The delays in getting timely environmental<br />

and forestry clearances from the Ministry of<br />

Environment and Forest (MoEF) during the past five<br />

to six years has not only affected a number of greenfield<br />

projects in the <strong>coal</strong> sector, but in the aluminium, steel and<br />

power sectors as well.<br />

Not only it was Vedanta Resources, whose clearance<br />

of a bauxite mining was cancelled in August this year by<br />

MoEF, but its prior approval for a six-fold expansion of a<br />

refinery in Orissa too was suspended.<br />

Earlier, Supreme Court had barred public sector<br />

undertaking, Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Ltd<br />

(KIOCL), from mining of iron ore from hills of Kudremukh<br />

citing environmental degradation. Tata Steel’s Gopalpur<br />

steel project too was delayed to great extent because of<br />

clearance related issues along with land acquisition<br />

problems.<br />

In addition, the ministry has delayed clearance to<br />

Pohang Iron and Steel Company’s (POSCO) ambitious<br />

project to set up a 12 million tons per annum integrated<br />

steel plant near the port town of Paradip, some 100 km<br />

from Bhubaneswar, citing various violations, including<br />

the Forest Rights Act. POSCO has proposed an investment<br />

of about $12 billion for the project.<br />

NTPC’s Loharinag Para hydel project (2 x 600 MW) too<br />

was cancelled on environmental issues, while a number<br />

of hydel projects in North Eastern part of India had either<br />

been delayed significantly or cancelled due to the same<br />

reason.<br />

On October 12, a delegation from Arunachal Pradesh<br />

took up with External Affairs Minister S M Krishna<br />

about his cabinet colleague Jairam Ramesh pitching for a<br />

moratorium on clearance for hydel projects in the state.<br />

The delegation led by Lok Sabha member Takam<br />

Sanjoy called on Krishna in New Delhi and sought his<br />

intervention, official sources in Itanagar said.<br />

Ramesh, the Union Environment and Forest minister,<br />

had recently taken up with the Prime Minister demands<br />

for review of all hydro projects in the Northeast and a<br />

moratorium on further clearances for hydel projects in<br />

Arunachal Pradesh saying these were bound to be the<br />

subject of agitation in Assam.<br />

The delegation apprised Krishna about the impact on<br />

Arunachal Pradesh if development and exploitation of its<br />

natural resources was halted, media reports said.<br />

Instead of protesting construction of a dam over<br />

Yrlang and Sangpo rivers on the Chinese side, Ramesh<br />

was trying to halt development in the state, the report said<br />

quoting the delegates.<br />

In another instance, MoEF has asked Jharkhand<br />

government to crack down on alleged illegal bauxite<br />

mines supplying the material the Vedanta Aluminium<br />

Ltd.<br />

Alleging that 11 out of these 14 mines are operating<br />

without prior environmental clearance, the ministry has<br />

shot off a letter to the Chief Secretary of Jharkhand, asking<br />

for corrective action.<br />

“Most of the mines in question appear to be operating<br />

under the deemed renewal. As per the directions of the<br />

Supreme Court of India and the clarification issue by the<br />

MoEF dated July 2, 2007, all such projects which have<br />

been operating without any environmental clearance<br />

would obtain environmental clearance at the time of their<br />

renewal of their mining lease”, said the MoEF letter to the<br />

Jharkhand Chief Secretary.<br />

“In view of the above, it is requested that all the<br />

concerned departments may be directed that the<br />

project proponent of the concerned mines shall obtain<br />

environmental clearance at the time of renewal of mine<br />

lease under the provisions of Environment Impact<br />

Assessment (EIA) Notification of 2006. Else, punitive<br />

action will need to be taken under the Environment<br />

Protection Act, 1986 for violating the EIA Notification of<br />

2006”, the letter added.<br />

However, in Rajasthan the state government has<br />

refused to cancel new mining leases in the Sariska range<br />

despite Union forests minister Jairam Ramesh asking<br />

chief minister Ashok Gehlot to put an end to mining in<br />

the Aravali ranges and cancel all new leases. The Supreme<br />

Court had earlier ruled: “no mining in Aravalis till further<br />

orders”.<br />

The mines department of Rajasthan said the order of<br />

the Suprement Court passed on February 2, 2010 is being<br />

fully implemented.<br />

“The court has restrained mining in cases of such mines<br />

where the renewal application is pending but lessees are<br />

doing mining as per the deeming provisions of rule 24A<br />

of Mineral Conservation Rules, 1960. The mining in such<br />

cases has been stopped completely,” a letter from mines<br />

department of Rajasthan said.<br />

More than 17 mines in and around Aravalis region are<br />

facing closure threat because of Supreme Court order.<br />

COAL INSIGHTS 40 October 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!