25.01.2015 Views

English Edition (6 MB pdf) - Saudi Aramco

English Edition (6 MB pdf) - Saudi Aramco

English Edition (6 MB pdf) - Saudi Aramco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tractor. The result is that the gripper element will not slip<br />

under the maximum load of the tractor’s exertion. Retraction<br />

of the gripper element is accomplished with redundant fail-safe<br />

springs, ensuring that the elements return to their non-energized<br />

state in all situations when the pump pressure falls below the<br />

threshold value.<br />

The operational walking sequence is as follows: Expand the<br />

forward gripper; direct the cylinders to move inward toward<br />

the CA, thereby forcing the forward tractor downhole;<br />

collapse the forward gripper then expand the aft gripper;<br />

direct the cylinders to move outward toward the tool joints,<br />

again forcing the tractor downhole; and finally collapse the aft<br />

gripper. This cycle repeats itself, producing a walking process<br />

that continues until the load on the tractor is sufficient to stall<br />

the tractor or the pressure differential is lowered below the<br />

start valve pressure threshold, stopping the tractor.<br />

HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT (HSE)<br />

The main concern related to the HSE aspects of the project<br />

involved the high concentration of H 2 S observed in the Manifa<br />

field, which could reach 10 wt% or 1,000 parts per million<br />

(ppm). During the project execution a significant number of<br />

personnel were expected in the area, performing tasks at<br />

different sites from road construction to operating the drilling<br />

rigs. The operator had identified areas of potential H 2 S releases<br />

and put in place monitoring devices at designated zones of<br />

maximum H 2 S concentration (10 ppm and 3 ppm zones).<br />

The stimulation of the water injection wells was planned with<br />

zero flow back strategy. No pressure bleed-off at the surface was<br />

allowed to take place throughout the entire operation.<br />

The H 2 S concern was also addressed through the use of H 2 S<br />

scavengers. First, several H 2 S scavengers were extensively tested<br />

to select the type and the concentration required to protect the<br />

completions and the CT pipe during the entire intervention.<br />

Second, the pump schedule was designed to include a large<br />

volume of preflush fluids containing the H 2 S scavenger. During<br />

the logging run, the injection of the treated water would help to<br />

further reduce the risk of having H 2 S at surface.<br />

JOB OPERATION<br />

The generic program for the intervention in the Manifa field<br />

wells could be summarized as:<br />

1. Rig up.<br />

2. Pressure test.<br />

3. Slick line run.<br />

4. Injection test (optional).<br />

5. CT run to perform stimulation:<br />

• Deployment of BHA and tractor.<br />

• RIH and tractor operation to reach TD.<br />

• Spot stimulation fluids while pull out of hole (POOH)<br />

in alternated stages of preflush, acid and diverter.<br />

• POOH and pressure retrieve BHA and tractor.<br />

6 SUMMER 2010 SAUDI ARAMCO JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY<br />

6. CT run with MPLT:<br />

• Deployment of BHA and tractor.<br />

• RIH and perform tractor operation to reach TD.<br />

• Perform logging passes.<br />

• POOH and pressure retrieve BHA.<br />

7. Slick line run with gauges.<br />

8. Injection test 10,000 barrels per day (bpd) at maximum<br />

2,200 psi for 2 days.<br />

9. Four days falloff test with downhole gauges in the well.<br />

Table 3 shows the amount of fluids used for the treatment<br />

in each well.<br />

Well 1 (Deepest Well)<br />

The TD of the well was 28,257 ft with 6,038 ft open hole<br />

completed with 7” tubing. The objective was to increase the<br />

injection rate of this well up to 10,000 bpm with a maximum<br />

pressure of 2,200 psi. Since there was no record of<br />

interventions in such ERWs in open hole, the operator set a<br />

conservative goal for the CT to reach far enough to cover<br />

50% of the open hole section.<br />

A pre-stimulation injection test was done and showed that<br />

the well could only take 1,750 bbl/day of water with wellhead<br />

pressure (WHP) reaching up to 2,200 psi. The initial<br />

simulation showed that without the aid of friction reducer or<br />

a tractor, the CT would lock-up at 16,900 ft. A first attempt<br />

to RIH with the tractor was aborted due to a failure with a<br />

release valve in the CA of the tractor. In a second run, the CT<br />

locked up at 22,200 ft. A pull test was performed and the<br />

tractor was activated observing an increase of 8,000 lbs in the<br />

CT weight, Figs. 4 and 5. The tractor pulled the CT without<br />

interruption at an average speed of 10 ft/min to reach TD at<br />

28,257 ft. At TD, the tractor was de-activated to reduce the<br />

pressure drop at the BHA and maximize the pumping rate.<br />

Over 1,500 bbls of acid fluid stages were then pumped and<br />

injected in the formation as the CT was POOH.<br />

After reaching the TD and completely pumping the acid<br />

treatment fluid, a post-injection test was done to evaluate the<br />

stimulation effectiveness and understand the well performance.<br />

Fig. 4. Simulation of CT lock-up in Well 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!