Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project

More documents

Recommendations

Info

the most important constituent group for the Central Arizona Project. And most of them were sophisticated enough to understand and get it. Some of the farming interests were allies, but many of them were not. There was a feeling that our demand that they give up their long term water allocations in exchange for being relieved from their long term “take or pay” obligations... Seemed to us made sense, you can’t afford to pay for it, give it back. If we have extra we’ll sell it to you. And we’ll sell it to you every year but we’ll tell you like five years in advance how much we think we’re going to have, but you don’t have any permanent right to it. The benefit, the larger societal management benefit of that is, and this is why I came to feel keeping agriculture in business is so important, agriculture is a buffer. In times of drought if you don’t have enough water you take it back from the farmers and you deliver it to the cities. In times of plenty if you have extra water give it to the farmers and let them plant some crops. So it becomes a mechanism to move water in and out of a use. That doesn’t exist in Nevada for example, they can’t do that. They can’t do that in Southern California really anymore. They can start now moving water in California from the Central Valley to the Coast. California has a big problem. People live and farm in different places. In Arizona we live and farm in essentially the same place, this corridor between Phoenix and Tucson, is where we use the CAP water. So we’re urbanizing the area we’re farming. Well if we keep some farming in business in that area then we can use that agricultural water use as a buffer. And that’s in fact exactly what we’ve done in the last few years of this drought. That’s why you can still wash your car any day of the week you want and you Interview with Grady Gammage Page 52 of 91
can’t do that in Las Vegas, because they took water back from the farmers. So it works really well as a management tool. Q. It seems like a lot of the farmers are going to end up being the Indians since they have the water and the land. A. That’s exactly right, which was another reason why I thought the Indian water settlement made sense. The Anglo-agriculture, the non-Indian agriculture will go out of business as that land is gobbled up for development. But when you urbanize, for years we’ve said well an acre that’s urbanized uses less water than an acre that’s planted in cotton, and that is generally speaking true. But once it’s urbanized you can’t get it back, you can’t ever get it back. You’re not going to tell people, oh by the way, you can’t turn on the water at your house for the next three months. I mean, tell a farmer that. But the farmers were outraged by that. So they, there were several groups of farmers, irrigation districts that didn’t like this whole scheme. Wanted their long-term rights, even though they couldn’t pay for them, that thought they didn’t have to pay for them, so they fought it. And there were principled people like George Campbell, whom I mentioned, who just thought the Indians are tiny, tiny segment of the population of Arizona and that they were getting control of too much water for the numbers of people they represent and so he didn’t like the deal either. Interview with Grady Gammage Page 53 of 91
Page 1 and 2: Interview with Grady Gammage CAP Or
Page 3 and 4: Q. Your father married his high sch
Page 5 and 6: A. Yes, I liked it. It worked reall
Page 7 and 8: frustrated her that I didn’t real
Page 9 and 10: Q. Did you go to downtown Phoenix m
Page 11 and 12: when you have a State agency that d
Page 13 and 14: would clear off, you’d sort of co
Page 15 and 16: to work and so I thought I probably
Page 17 and 18: Q. Prior to that they couldn’t se
Page 19 and 20: like the substance. I liked explain
Page 21 and 22: the CAP Board by the City of Phoeni
Page 23 and 24: Q. It’s kind of interesting that
Page 25 and 26: this bizarre…and the other thing
Page 27 and 28: wanted to get. Until the cities gre
Page 29 and 30: you could grow cotton. You could ma
Page 31 and 32: You are the presiding officer of th
Page 33 and 34: A. Well, you know the immediate thi
Page 35 and 36: that has driven civilization to exi
Page 37 and 38: dealt with it are afraid to reopen
Page 39 and 40: seepage. But we have all this extra
Page 41 and 42: it’s a bank. You don’t know whe
Page 43 and 44: this water has been banked, not thr
Page 46 and 47: the notice of completion. The notic
Page 48 and 49: to be our big customers couldn’t
Page 50 and 51: that. That we needed to get some le
Page 54 and 55: Q. It’s ironic that Bruce Babbitt
Page 56 and 57: thing but it was different because
Page 58 and 59: Q. We do have water in the Phoenix
Page 60 and 61: complex commodities for our legal s
Page 62 and 63: AMA which was designed to be deplet
Page 64 and 65: end. Well, that worked great for a
Page 66 and 67: ationing water in Phoenix. I said,
Page 68 and 69: water that could be used for agricu
Page 70 and 71: Q. It’s not a current position A.
Page 72 and 73: A. Yeah. I think it was as much as
Page 74 and 75: our side. In the war of western wat
Page 76 and 77: A. It’s interesting. I was in Las
Page 78 and 79: Q. Talking about Nevada again, ther
Page 80 and 81: A. Yeah. Then there’s the Columbi
Page 82 and 83: not sure that’s right. I think it
Page 84 and 85: There’s really two. There’s “
Page 86 and 87: enough to it to hear about things.
Page 88 and 89: Q. Well people might be ready for H
Page 90 and 91: Q. Do you think the new members of

Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?