Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Q. It’s not a current position<br />
A. No.<br />
Q. It doesn’t seem like <strong>Arizona</strong> has as many water commissions or things as<br />
Nevada or Colorado<br />
A. It doesn’t. This is an interesting phenomenon, too. When I went to Texas, I was<br />
stunned to find out how many different water entities and agencies they have.<br />
They’re kind of like counties. Texas has like 280 counties or something. They<br />
have an equal number of water districts and they’re little tiny entities. Despite the<br />
law of the biggest pump and the fact that it’s Texas, they’ve tended to treat water<br />
in little isolated pieces; whereas in <strong>Arizona</strong>, we’ve tended to have a few large,<br />
well-funded, well-managed, water agency type things like SRP, CAP, and the<br />
various cities. City of Phoenix and City of Mesa have very large water portfolios.<br />
And so our water decision making is somewhat more concentrated than it is in<br />
other states but in the same token, we don’t have a water czar. In Nevada there<br />
is a State Engineer and in Colorado there is State Engineer who gets to rule and<br />
adjudicate on water rights and water disputes. We didn’t even have the<br />
Department of Water Resources until it was created under the Groundwater<br />
Management Act. Herb Guenther, the Director, and all the previous Directors<br />
really have very little authority over surface water. Their authority is only over<br />
groundwater and by large, only in the AMAs. So we have a multiple decision<br />
making context.<br />
<strong>Interview</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Grady</strong> <strong>Gammage</strong><br />
Page 70 of 91