Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Interview with Grady Gammage - Central Arizona Project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Q. Talking about Nevada again, there’s been some talk that in the Water Compact<br />
that Nevada got little water. Some people have said that maybe that should be<br />
reopened and renegotiated. What are your thoughts on that<br />
A. Well, there could be benefit to that from <strong>Arizona</strong>’s standpoint. We are the junior<br />
right holder. One of the prices that I’ve always understood that Wayne Aspinall<br />
from Colorado exacted for funding of the CAP is that we have to be behind<br />
everybody else. That’s not fair. The urban areas should have equivalent priority<br />
it seems to me. It’s not fair to take water away from people in their houses in<br />
Phoenix and say give it to people in their houses in San Bernardino or<br />
something. So there could be significant benefit to us in doing that. Having said<br />
that, I don’t think it’s very likely. I think it’s too complicated. It took too long the<br />
first time. There are too many stakeholders. Most of the water buffalo, water<br />
players are afraid to reopen it for fear that the anti-growth and environmental<br />
forces, which they believe are out there, are conspiring at all times. I’m not sure<br />
if that’s true but that’s the way water buffaloes tend to think, would wind up<br />
getting a lot of the water and using it for lurminnows or willow flycatchers. So<br />
they’re reluctant to reopen it. California, I think, would be reluctant to reopen it<br />
because they got so much water. It seems to me difficult to imagine negotiating<br />
something like that again.<br />
<strong>Interview</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Grady</strong> <strong>Gammage</strong><br />
Page 78 of 91