Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie
Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie
Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Kilcoole</strong> Local Area Plan 2008<br />
Manager’s <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong> 2006 census populati<strong>on</strong>, permissi<strong>on</strong>s granted and c<strong>on</strong>structed<br />
since 2006 and existing permissi<strong>on</strong>s, which have yet <strong>to</strong> begin c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>. These<br />
secti<strong>on</strong>s clearly set out <strong>the</strong> process under which it was determined what land<br />
requirements were needed in order <strong>to</strong> accommodate <strong>the</strong> projected populati<strong>on</strong> in<br />
2016. The calculati<strong>on</strong>s also provide for an “excess fac<strong>to</strong>r” and substantial<br />
“headroom”, given <strong>the</strong> strategic locati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> settlement of <strong>Kilcoole</strong>, its<br />
designati<strong>on</strong> as a Small Growth Town I in <strong>the</strong> Regi<strong>on</strong>al Planning Guidelines and<br />
<strong>the</strong> demand for housing. No fur<strong>the</strong>r residential z<strong>on</strong>ing is required <strong>to</strong> meet <strong>the</strong><br />
current populati<strong>on</strong>s targets and <strong>the</strong> excessive z<strong>on</strong>ing of land may lead <strong>to</strong><br />
populati<strong>on</strong> targets being exceeded, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall detriment of <strong>the</strong> settlement.<br />
The new residential z<strong>on</strong>ings proposed had regard <strong>the</strong> following spatial criteria (as<br />
set out in Part A of <strong>the</strong> draft plan):-<br />
• Unz<strong>on</strong>ed lands closest <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing <strong>to</strong>wn centre shall be c<strong>on</strong>sidered first for<br />
new z<strong>on</strong>ing (<strong>the</strong> ‘<strong>to</strong>wn centre’ being taken as <strong>the</strong> Sea Road – Main Street<br />
juncti<strong>on</strong>).<br />
• Lands that meet a social or community need<br />
• Lands z<strong>on</strong>ed AGR in <strong>the</strong> 2002 LAP shall <strong>the</strong>n be c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />
The lands that are <strong>the</strong> subject of this submissi<strong>on</strong> are not c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>to</strong> accord with<br />
<strong>the</strong>se criteria and would lead <strong>to</strong> an excessive spread of <strong>the</strong> settlement <strong>on</strong> its<br />
nor<strong>the</strong>rn side and lead <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> possible undesired coalescence of <strong>Kilcoole</strong> and<br />
Greyst<strong>on</strong>es<br />
3. This z<strong>on</strong>ing cannot be c<strong>on</strong>sidered outside of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text of a full Strategic<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment. The SEA screen carr<strong>ie</strong>d out determined that a full<br />
SEA was not required as <strong>the</strong> plan was unlikely <strong>to</strong> have significant adverse<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact <strong>on</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mentally sensitive recep<strong>to</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong> area.<br />
However, this would have <strong>to</strong> be rev<strong>ie</strong>wed if this z<strong>on</strong>ing were <strong>to</strong> be c<strong>on</strong>sidered and<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive would be likely <strong>to</strong> require an ‘appropriate<br />
assessment’ of <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPA. Under ‘appropriate<br />
assessment’ where any possible impact is identif<strong>ie</strong>d, <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>ing cannot proceed;<br />
mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures are not c<strong>on</strong>sidered suffic<strong>ie</strong>nt.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Managers</str<strong>on</strong>g> Recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />
No change <strong>to</strong> LAP.<br />
Submissi<strong>on</strong> no. 18 (mapped)<br />
Mr. Foley, T.J. and McGarry, George<br />
This submissi<strong>on</strong> relates <strong>to</strong> land (2.89ha) at Ballyd<strong>on</strong>area within AA1. Part of <strong>the</strong> land<br />
is located in proposed AA1 (c.1.2ha CE & c. 0.6ha AOS) and part (c. 1.1ha) is located<br />
outside of <strong>the</strong> draft plan boundary and proposed AG z<strong>on</strong>e. It is requested that this<br />
holding be z<strong>on</strong>ed ‘E’ - employment<br />
Manager’s Resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />
1. This proposed re-z<strong>on</strong>ing of “AG” lands, al<strong>on</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> LAP boundary extensi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
is not recommended. Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.3 of Part A of draft LAP sets out <strong>the</strong> background<br />
and rati<strong>on</strong>ale for employment z<strong>on</strong>ing and takes in<strong>to</strong> account <strong>the</strong> 2016 populati<strong>on</strong><br />
projecti<strong>on</strong> for <strong>Kilcoole</strong> as set out in <strong>the</strong> County Development Plan, al<strong>on</strong>g with<br />
labour force participati<strong>on</strong> rate in <strong>Wicklow</strong>, plot ratio, current z<strong>on</strong>ing etc. This<br />
secti<strong>on</strong> clearly set out <strong>the</strong> process under which it was determined what land<br />
requirements were needed for employment use by 2016 given <strong>the</strong> strategic<br />
locati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> settlement of <strong>Kilcoole</strong>, its designati<strong>on</strong> as a Small Growth Town I in<br />
29