29.01.2015 Views

Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie

Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie

Managers Report on submissions to the Draft Kilcoole ... - Wicklow.ie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Kilcoole</strong> Local Area Plan 2008<br />

Manager’s <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

draft plan. It would appear that <strong>the</strong> submissi<strong>on</strong> is endeavouring <strong>to</strong> show how <strong>the</strong><br />

proposals would be c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r objectives of <strong>the</strong> plan.<br />

Manager’s Resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

The lands in questi<strong>on</strong> are proposed for TC z<strong>on</strong>ing, which is no change from <strong>the</strong> 2002<br />

plan. Positive pre-planning discussi<strong>on</strong>s have already been carr<strong>ie</strong>d out.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Managers</str<strong>on</strong>g> Recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

No change <strong>to</strong> LAP.<br />

Submissi<strong>on</strong> no. 37 (mapped)<br />

Mr. T<strong>on</strong>er, John<br />

This submissi<strong>on</strong> relates Glenroe Farm. It is requested that <strong>the</strong> AT z<strong>on</strong>ing be extended<br />

<strong>to</strong> include <strong>the</strong> entire landholding and agri-<strong>to</strong>urism activit<strong>ie</strong>s are already occurring <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lands.<br />

Manager’s Resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

The boundar<strong>ie</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> AT z<strong>on</strong>e proposed in <strong>the</strong> draft plan corresp<strong>on</strong>d <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> area for<br />

which planning permissi<strong>on</strong> exists for <strong>the</strong> agri-<strong>to</strong>urism facility.<br />

Having regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> proximity of <strong>the</strong> eastern part of <strong>the</strong> holding <strong>to</strong> The Murrough<br />

SPA, this suggested z<strong>on</strong>ing cannot be c<strong>on</strong>sidered outside of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text of a full<br />

Strategic Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment. The SEA screen carr<strong>ie</strong>d out determined that a<br />

full SEA was not required as <strong>the</strong> plan was unlikely <strong>to</strong> have significant adverse<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental impact <strong>on</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>mentally sensitive recep<strong>to</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong> area. However,<br />

this would have <strong>to</strong> be rev<strong>ie</strong>wed if this z<strong>on</strong>ing were <strong>to</strong> be c<strong>on</strong>sidered and fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Habitats Directive would be likely <strong>to</strong> require an ‘appropriate assessment’ of <strong>the</strong><br />

impact of <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> SPA. Under ‘appropriate assessment’ where any possible<br />

impact is identif<strong>ie</strong>d, <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>ing cannot proceed; mitigati<strong>on</strong> measures are not<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered suffic<strong>ie</strong>nt.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Managers</str<strong>on</strong>g> Recommendati<strong>on</strong><br />

No change <strong>to</strong> LAP.<br />

Submissi<strong>on</strong> no. 38 (mapped)<br />

Mr. Webb, John<br />

This submissi<strong>on</strong> relates <strong>to</strong> a landholding of c. 9.5ha at Cooldross Lower (at <strong>the</strong> far<br />

eastern end of Cooldross Lane). The landowner desires <strong>to</strong> utilise existing disused<br />

agricultural buildings as a wood chip manufacturing plant and requests <strong>the</strong><br />

appropriate z<strong>on</strong>ing for <strong>the</strong> site.<br />

Manager’s Resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

These lands are c. 300m from <strong>the</strong> proposed development boundary of <strong>the</strong> settlement<br />

and are located in a rural, undeveloped area. While improvements <strong>to</strong> Cooldross Lane<br />

are planned <strong>to</strong> be carr<strong>ie</strong>d out from <strong>the</strong> new roundabout back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> R761, no<br />

improvements are proposed for <strong>the</strong> c. 300m secti<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> roundabout and this<br />

site. This lane is not c<strong>on</strong>sidered suitable without substantial improvement for <strong>the</strong> type<br />

of facility proposed. The County Development Plan generally does not allow for<br />

industrial type development in rural areas. For <strong>the</strong>se reas<strong>on</strong>s, z<strong>on</strong>ing is not<br />

recommended.<br />

This z<strong>on</strong>ing cannot be c<strong>on</strong>sidered outside of <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text of a full Strategic<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Assessment. The SEA screen carr<strong>ie</strong>d out determined that a full SEA<br />

was not required as <strong>the</strong> plan was unlikely <strong>to</strong> have significant adverse envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!