29.01.2015 Views

New Classic Poems – Contemporary Verse That Rhymes

New Classic Poems – Contemporary Verse That Rhymes

New Classic Poems – Contemporary Verse That Rhymes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Classic</strong> <strong>Poems</strong><br />

Is Poetry Dead<br />

brilliant poet-songwriters such as Leonard<br />

Cohen and Tom Waits have almost bridged this<br />

chasm; but their performances are an integral,<br />

inseparable component of their special art. Their<br />

song-poems are generally appreciated as auditory<br />

experiences rather than as words read from<br />

printed pages.<br />

Most readers now have little or no<br />

exposure to well-written, contemporary, formal<br />

poetry. In our modern world, poems that rhyme<br />

are merely old-fashioned; something we were<br />

exposed to during school days when the works<br />

of dead poets were exhumed for dissection in<br />

English literature classes.<br />

This book was born of frustration with<br />

this state of affairs. Just as a preponderance of<br />

badly-written free verse in no way diminishes the<br />

genius of accomplished poets who have<br />

mastered that genre, a plethora of commercial,<br />

rhyming doggerel does not reflect the ingenuity,<br />

grandeur, emotional impact and intellectual<br />

integrity of well-constructed, formal poetry.<br />

Unfortunately, even the best of modern,<br />

formal poetry may not reach a potentially<br />

appreciative audience. The most casual survey of<br />

the current books and journals where poetry<br />

appears confirms that, except for a few<br />

publications with a bent towards neoformalism,<br />

there exists an almost universal prejudice against<br />

poetry that scans and rhymes. Neoformalists<br />

believe good poetry does not require its readers<br />

to possess special education or arcane sensitivity<br />

in order to appreciate it properly. <strong>Classic</strong>al poets<br />

always directed their work at a literate,<br />

thoughtful, but general audience. By contrast,<br />

obscurantism seems to have been elevated to the<br />

cardinal virtue of free verse. The more<br />

obstinately such a work refuses to divulge its<br />

meaning to the general reader, the more likely it<br />

is to find a home on the printed page.<br />

At the same time, the free verse style of<br />

poetry considered avant-garde in our<br />

grandparents’ generation has grown rather<br />

inward-looking and stale. Its audience has<br />

shrunk proportionately. The anæmic sales of<br />

poetry books in comparison to other fiction and<br />

non-fiction stands as irrefutable evidence of the<br />

book-buying public’s indifference towards<br />

contemporary poetic expression. If money talks<br />

in our modern world, the silence is deafening.<br />

Having utterly lost touch with the kind<br />

of mass readership that Longfellow enjoyed in<br />

his lifetime, present-day poets direct their output<br />

mainly towards each other, publishing on the<br />

Internet, or <strong>–</strong> when they can get their works into<br />

print at all <strong>–</strong> in thin chap books and special<br />

interest journals. Total press runs typically range<br />

from dozens to a few thousand copies for a<br />

“best seller.”<br />

Moribund it may be; but formal poetry is<br />

not quite dead in the 21 st Century.<br />

With fortuitous timing, modern<br />

technology comes to the aid of this<br />

ailing, traditional art form. Although the<br />

democratic medium of the Internet<br />

indiscriminately spreads literary drivel, it also<br />

allows serious and talented poets of all genres to<br />

address a potentially wide audience.<br />

With this in mind, <strong>Contemporary</strong> Formal<br />

Poetry decided to throw open its Internet site to a<br />

contest for rhyming, metrical poems only.<br />

Detailed guidelines for what would and would<br />

not be acceptable were posted. (Appendix A.)<br />

The very concept of a poetry competition is<br />

inherently problematic. Which poem is the<br />

“best” <strong>–</strong> The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, The<br />

Village Blacksmith, or Do Not Go Gentle Into <strong>That</strong><br />

Good Night Poet, teacher, editor and noted critic<br />

John Ciardi once warned that “there will never<br />

be a complete system for … ‘judging’ poetry.” 2<br />

Therefore three equal prizes of CDN$ 50 were<br />

initially offered for three works that would stand<br />

out as being particularly praiseworthy in some<br />

manner.<br />

<strong>Poems</strong> in all formal “western” styles<br />

were invited: sonnets, villanelles, odes, elegies<br />

and epics, narratives, ballades, acrostics and so on.<br />

Particularly welcomed were the longer works<br />

that cannot get published elsewhere <strong>–</strong> the big<br />

narratives that do not fit within the limited space<br />

available in small periodicals, or inside the<br />

cramped submission boxes on most of the postit-yourself<br />

Internet competitions.<br />

This contest immediately attracted an<br />

untapped mother lode of poetic creativity. The<br />

first entry, Peter Gilchrist’s polished narrative,<br />

The Sparrow and the Hawk, appeared in the E-mail<br />

in-box within hours of the contest’s<br />

announcement. Several hundred entries were<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!