Human Rights-Based Intelligence Operations - Commission on ...
Human Rights-Based Intelligence Operations - Commission on ...
Human Rights-Based Intelligence Operations - Commission on ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Human</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Rights</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Intelligence</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Operati<strong>on</strong>s</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Neglect of Duty under the Doctrine<br />
of “Command Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility”<br />
The Commander shall be held accountable<br />
for the neglect of duty if he has knowledge<br />
that a crime or offense is to be committed, is<br />
being committed, or has been committed by<br />
his subordinate, or by others within his area<br />
of resp<strong>on</strong>sibility and, despite such knowledge,<br />
he did not take preventive or corrective acti<strong>on</strong><br />
either before, during or immediately after its<br />
commissi<strong>on</strong>.(Secti<strong>on</strong> 1, Executive Order 226)<br />
Presumpti<strong>on</strong> of Knowledge<br />
A Commanding Officer is presumed<br />
to have knowledge of the commissi<strong>on</strong> of<br />
irregularities or criminal offenses within his<br />
area of resp<strong>on</strong>sibility in any of the following<br />
circumstances:<br />
1. When the irregularities or illegal acts are<br />
widespread within his area of jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>;<br />
2. When the irregularities or illegal acts are<br />
repeatedly or regularly committed within<br />
his area of resp<strong>on</strong>sibility; or<br />
3. When members of his immediate staff or<br />
office pers<strong>on</strong>nel are involved.<br />
[Secti<strong>on</strong> 2, Executive Order 226]<br />
Command Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />
under RA 9851<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong>s 8-12, RA 9851 provide that a superior<br />
shall be criminally resp<strong>on</strong>sible as a principal<br />
for crimes committed by subordinates under<br />
his/her effective command and c<strong>on</strong>trol, or<br />
effective authority and c<strong>on</strong>trol, as a result of<br />
his/her failure to properly exercise c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />
over such subordinates, where:<br />
1. He/she either knew or, owing to the<br />
circumstances at the time, should have<br />
known that his/her subordinates were<br />
committing; and,<br />
2. He/she failed to take all necessary<br />
and reas<strong>on</strong>able measures within his/<br />
her power to prevent or repress their<br />
commissi<strong>on</strong> or to submit the matter to the<br />
competent authorities for investigati<strong>on</strong><br />
and prosecuti<strong>on</strong>. (Secti<strong>on</strong> 10, RA 9851)<br />
Duties of the Commanding Officer<br />
1. Undertake Corrective Measures <strong>on</strong> any<br />
Misc<strong>on</strong>duct Committed by AFP Pers<strong>on</strong>nel<br />
Commanders shall ensure that all participants<br />
in security operati<strong>on</strong>s shall be briefed and<br />
debriefed before and after every operati<strong>on</strong><br />
to insure proper behavior of pers<strong>on</strong>nel and<br />
understanding of their missi<strong>on</strong> as well as to<br />
assess the overall impact of the operati<strong>on</strong><br />
to AFP goals and objectives and whenever<br />
necessary immediately undertake corrective<br />
measures <strong>on</strong> any misc<strong>on</strong>duct committed by<br />
AFP pers<strong>on</strong>nel. (DND/ DILG Joint Circular<br />
Number 2-91 dated September 9, 1991)<br />
17