NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IV. PRINCIPLES ESTABLISHED 71<br />
not be upon the fringe of the functions of employees admittedly in the<br />
unit."<br />
In Matter of Birdsboro Steel Foundry Company 61 the petitioning<br />
organization, as opposed to the contention of the company and a competing<br />
organization, urged the exclusion of storeroom employees from<br />
a unit of production and maintenance employees. The storeroom employees<br />
gave out parts and supplies to the workmen as requested. The<br />
Board included the storeroom employees within the unit, 62 stating:<br />
In our opinion these employees are in such close contact with the production<br />
and maintenance workers that they should be included hi the voting unit.<br />
In Matter of Lowe Brothers Company 63 two labor organizations<br />
disagreed as to the inclusion within a plant unit of technical service<br />
employees, engaged in the testing of raw materials and manufactured<br />
products. Although they were paid on a salary basis, as contrasted<br />
with the regular production employees who were paid on an hourly<br />
basis, and as salaried employees enjoyed more privileges, including<br />
vacations, than ordinary production workers, they had no technical<br />
training. They were eligible to membership in both organizations and<br />
had been included in the unit under a prior contract. The Board held<br />
that they should be included within the appropriate unit.<br />
In Matter of Western Cartridge Company 64 office employees and<br />
watchmen had been included in a plant unit covered by a collective<br />
bargaining agreement. The petitioning labor organization requested<br />
a unit of production and maintenance employees in one geographically<br />
separated division of the company and further requested the exclusion<br />
of supervisory employees, office employees, and watchmen from this<br />
unit. The contracting union waived its claim to represent the employees<br />
in the unit urged. The Board found the division unit appropriate<br />
and excluded the office employees and watchmen, noting their<br />
differing interests and functions and the contracting union's waiver<br />
of the right to represent all employees in the division.<br />
In Matter of Brown. Company 65 the parties disagreed as to whether<br />
watchmen should be included in an industrial or a semi-industrial<br />
unit. The company employed 66 watchmen. The labor organization<br />
which desired their inclusion, claimed that it represented a majority<br />
of them. Another labor organization claiming to represent a semiindustrial<br />
unit desired the exclusion of the watchmen therefrom. The<br />
Board directed that a separate election be held among the watchmen<br />
to determine whether or not they wished to be included in the broad<br />
unit."<br />
66 See in this connection, Fourth Annual Report pp. 94-97; cf. also Fifth Annual<br />
Report, pp. 70-72, and Third Annual Report, pp. 185-190.<br />
61 Matter of Birdsboro Steel Foundry t Machine Co. and Steel Workers Orgorazing<br />
Committee, etc., 32 N. L. R. B., No. 20.<br />
'2 Board Member Edwin S. Smith dissenting.<br />
a3 Matter of Lowe Bros. Co.. and United Mine Workers of America, 32 N. L. R. B.. No. 78.<br />
61 Matter of Western Cartridge CO. and Chemical Workers Local Union, etc., 31 N. L. R. B,.<br />
No. 148.<br />
e5 Matter or Brown Co. and International Brotherhood of Pulp, Sulphite and Paper Mill<br />
Workers, etc., 31 N. L. R. B., No. 46.<br />
60 Since three other separate elections were directed, it was not clear at the time of the<br />
issuance of the Decision and Direction of Election, whether the broad unit would be<br />
industrial or semi-industrial in nature. The labor organization which sought the inclusion<br />
of the watchmen was contending for an industrial unit. Subsequently, it won the elections<br />
in each of the four groups and was certified (33 N. L. R. B., No. 157) as the<br />
exclusive representative of all four groups in a single industrial unit.