14.11.2012 Views

Conformal Geometric Algebra in Stochastic Optimization Problems ...

Conformal Geometric Algebra in Stochastic Optimization Problems ...

Conformal Geometric Algebra in Stochastic Optimization Problems ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 CHAPTER 3. THE CONFORMAL GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA<br />

A ∗ 〈k〉<br />

xp = (x · A ∗−1<br />

〈k〉 )A∗ 〈k〉<br />

= (x · (A 〈k〉 I −1 ) −1 )A 〈k〉 I −1<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

=<br />

�<br />

⎡<br />

x ·<br />

⎣x ·<br />

(A 〈k〉 I −1 ) ∼<br />

(A 〈k〉 I −1 ) ∼ (A 〈k〉 I −1 )<br />

⎤<br />

�<br />

A 〈k〉 I −1<br />

−I � A 〈k〉<br />

(−I � ⎦A 〈k〉 I<br />

A 〈k〉 )(−A 〈k〉 I)<br />

−1<br />

�<br />

x · A −1<br />

〈k〉 I<br />

�<br />

A 〈k〉 I −1<br />

�<br />

x ∧ A −1<br />

〈k〉<br />

�<br />

IA 〈k〉 I −1<br />

(3.3)<br />

= (x ∧ A −1<br />

〈k〉 )A 〈k〉 , (3.4)<br />

where it was used that <strong>in</strong> �4,1: � I = I, I −1 = −I, I 2 = −1 and A 〈k〉 I = IA 〈k〉 .<br />

Hence equation (3.4) (which orig<strong>in</strong>ally represents a rejection, see equation (2.61))<br />

is used <strong>in</strong>stead of equation (3.3).<br />

Where Po<strong>in</strong>ts Project to Spheres<br />

Next to conformal po<strong>in</strong>ts, spheres and planes are equally vectors, that is to say<br />

elements that can make up a null space 5 . Clearly, projection and rejection split<br />

a vector <strong>in</strong>to two orthogonal vector parts. But it will turn out that the manifold<br />

of conformal po<strong>in</strong>ts is not closed under addition; whence it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

project<strong>in</strong>g a po<strong>in</strong>t may end with a plane or a sphere.<br />

On the Sandwich Product<br />

This important product reappears <strong>in</strong> this chapter be<strong>in</strong>g the subject of several sections.<br />

Let A and X be general multivectors. Apply<strong>in</strong>g A or its dual to X may at<br />

least change the sign of the result, compare<br />

3.3.2 Useful Notes on CGA<br />

AXA = A ∗ IXA ∗ I = −A ∗ XA ∗ . (3.5)<br />

It is begun by repeat<strong>in</strong>g the most important basis blades.<br />

e = e∞ = e+ + e−<br />

5 When mention<strong>in</strong>g, for <strong>in</strong>stance, the OPNS of a blade A〈k〉, only the underly<strong>in</strong>g set of conformal<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts is meant rather than all vectors <strong>in</strong> �er(A 〈k〉) ⊆ � 4,1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!