15.11.2012 Views

development control board agenda - Borough Council of King's ...

development control board agenda - Borough Council of King's ...

development control board agenda - Borough Council of King's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the landscape, the screening and the bio-diversity <strong>of</strong> both the houses and the new site. The<br />

tree is likely to die from both root loss and loss <strong>of</strong> the ground water that currently supplies it.<br />

The tree is shown in the photos on drawing 2025/P25 (<strong>of</strong> the eastern boundary and more<br />

clearly along the northern boundary to Wheatfield’s). The tree also may be affected by site<br />

works including constructing the tree lined walk and mounding.<br />

It is therefore recommended that this proposed drainage is amended so that any drains or<br />

other site works are outside the root protection area <strong>of</strong> this tree, as defined by BS5837:2005<br />

and that the tree is also protected by fencing designed to this standard. It is also<br />

recommended that all trees retained around the site are protected to this standard. Thus an<br />

Arboricultural implication assessment, method statement and root protection plan to BS<br />

5837 are recommended, and that the drainage plan is revised to ensure the protection and<br />

retention <strong>of</strong> boundary trees. The tree is currently helping to drain the site around it because<br />

<strong>of</strong> its relatively high water uptake due to its species and size.<br />

The <strong>development</strong> also requires a detailed landscape scheme to address the issues <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>development</strong> in the countryside, and the amenity <strong>of</strong> both site users and existing residents, so<br />

a condition is needed for this.<br />

Campaign to Protect Rural England: Concern is expressed in relation to the effect the<br />

<strong>development</strong> will have on the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> residents who adjoin the site. In particular<br />

concern is expressed in relation to over-looking and noise generation activities which are<br />

located towards the properties in Wheatfield’s.<br />

In relation to lighting it is confirmed that this will certainly change the character and<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> this dark skies area. The External Lighting Report says that the lighting will be<br />

<strong>control</strong>led by time switches and photocells but does not specify the time periods over which<br />

lights will be switched on and what proportion <strong>of</strong> the lights will be 'dusk to dawn'. The<br />

proposed 70 watt high pressure sodium lamps will produce a very urbanising effect on<br />

surrounding rural landscapes. There are more energy efficient white light sources currently<br />

available, these should be used. The report refers to the shielding <strong>of</strong> lights it does not specify<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> the full cut <strong>of</strong>f flat glass fitments. Such lights not only minimise upward light spill<br />

but they also reduce the horizontal light spill over the surrounding areas.<br />

REPRESENTATIONS<br />

Twenty-one letters <strong>of</strong> representation have been received. Fourteen <strong>of</strong> these letters support<br />

the application. The letters <strong>of</strong> objection raise the following concerns:<br />

• Consultation exercise carried out by the applicant was just a 'tick box' exercise;<br />

• Two storey element is much closer towards gardens resulting in over-looking;<br />

• Drainage measures are too vague;<br />

• Should be responsibility for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> adjoining ditches and an undertaking<br />

by the Environment Agency to investigate the aquifer on site;<br />

• Footpath on the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the site should be deleted;<br />

• Concern in relation to light pollution from the building and adjoining car parking<br />

areas;<br />

• Substantial landscaping should be incorporated and be in place before work in<br />

commenced;<br />

• The earth mound should be in the order <strong>of</strong> 3 metres in height along the eastern<br />

fringes <strong>of</strong> the site;<br />

• Impact on wildlife needs to be fully assessed;<br />

• Time limits should be imposed relating to hours <strong>of</strong> construction;<br />

• Concern in relation to traffic assess and parking;<br />

09/00699/RMM Development Control Board<br />

6 th July 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!