Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RELATIONSHIP OF JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY<br />
further event, one they had not anticipated at all; namely, the<br />
messiah's death.<br />
Caution: Whenever one responds to a new event, believing this<br />
event illuminates the original event, there is a risk. On the one hand,<br />
the response shows faithfulness. On the other hand, there are great<br />
dangers. One risk is to give your trust and faith to a false messiah—the<br />
new arrival may turn out not to be the true messiah. There is a further<br />
risk—the new developments may lead to a transformation of the<br />
original ideas. Then, out of trying to be faithful to the new experience,<br />
one may find oneself in some way leaving behind or betraying the<br />
original commitments. Which then are true: the old ideas or the new<br />
ones? Or both? The answer, of course, is that there is no guarantee in<br />
advance. Wait until it is all clarified and it will be too late. One must<br />
respond right now. Faith response is a wager of one's own life, out of<br />
faithfulness.<br />
Consider the Jewish Sitz im Leben of those faithful Jewish Christians<br />
responding to the messiah. Here was this man whom they<br />
experienced as the messiah. He was shockingly killed. It was a<br />
terrible, degrading death. Equally shocking was the belief the messiah<br />
was supposed to bring the final perfection: peace, dignity, prosperity,<br />
independence. Instead of doing all this, this messiah died miserably,<br />
according to some reports, even in despair and self-denial.<br />
Now, as faithful Jews (they still were not Christians) how ought<br />
they to have responded to his death? Should they have said, "He was<br />
a false messiah"? Should they have betrayed the original insight that<br />
this person was the messiah? Or should they have thought, "Maybe<br />
this death is another event that illuminates the meaning of the<br />
previous event"? Maybe the Crucifixion is not a refutation of Jesus'<br />
being the messiah, but rather a clarification of the nature of<br />
redemption. Up to now, they thought that the messiah would<br />
straighten out the political and economic world, because that was the<br />
mental image of what it meant to perfect the world. But if I as an early<br />
Christian knew this was the messiah but he did not bring worldly<br />
liberation, I had an alternative to yielding faith. The alternative was to<br />
say that the death is teaching a lesson. The lesson is that true<br />
redemption is not in this world. The kingdom of God is within you.<br />
Faith leads to a world of spiritual perfection: even though I am a slave,<br />
I am free in Christ.<br />
The Christians responded faithfully but later history suggests<br />
theymade a hermeneutical error. To put it another way: In retrospect,<br />
it was a mistake to say that the explanation of the Crucifixion is that<br />
9