19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JEWISH "NO" AND CHRISTIAN "YES"<br />

messianic age had arrived and that they were a community standing<br />

at the consummation of history and that the kingdom of God was just<br />

around the corner. A part of the early Christian community believed<br />

that in the light of the approaching divine revolution new rules were<br />

required with regard to the Gentiles. Now in order for the Gentiles to<br />

join the covenant of God with Israel and thus enter the world to come<br />

(as a rabbinic saying has it: the whole of Israel has a share in the world<br />

to come) and be saved from the Last Judgment, it was no longer<br />

necessary to join the covenant of Sinai involving circumcision and the<br />

observance of the "613 commandments" of the Torah, but they could<br />

enter the covenant with the God of Israel through incorporation into<br />

the "body of Christ" and in this way get a share in the world to come.<br />

This understanding of the Resurrection as the eschatological act of<br />

God bringing about the new order of justice, peace, and joy led the<br />

disciples of Jesus to call him "messiah." The majority of the Jewish<br />

community, however, did not perceive that what had happened to<br />

Jesus was the decisive turning point in history and did not share the<br />

conclusions drawn from it by the early Christian community, nor<br />

were they convinced that Jesus was the messiah, since in no way was<br />

the new order coming about.<br />

Now after 1950 years the plain fact is that the divine revolution on<br />

which the early Christian community counted has not materialized.<br />

The church had to abandon the thought that it stood at the end of<br />

history. It continued to live within history, but by doing so it claimed<br />

to continue the history of Israel, to replace the Jewish people as God's<br />

people and to be the "true" or the "new" Israel. Jesus, now<br />

designated with the name "messiah," remained the central figure of<br />

this community, but no longer as the eschatological figure who fulfills<br />

the Torah, but as the normative figure who replaces the Torah, so that<br />

the Torah was no longer the norm, but Jesus Christ became the norm<br />

of thought and action. Although the church maintains that Jesus has<br />

fulfilled the Torah, in reality the Torah remains unfulfilled, because<br />

the new world order of doing justice, loving kindness, and being<br />

humble in going with God has not yet come to humanity.<br />

At this point we meet the Jewish "no" to the claims made by the<br />

church for Jesus. As Friedrich-Wilhelm Marquardt has pointed out,<br />

this Jewish "no" is an expression of Jewish faithfulness to the Torah,<br />

to its God-given calling. This is the dignity of the Jewish "no" to Jesus.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!