Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JEWISH "NO" AND CHRISTIAN "YES"<br />
messianic age had arrived and that they were a community standing<br />
at the consummation of history and that the kingdom of God was just<br />
around the corner. A part of the early Christian community believed<br />
that in the light of the approaching divine revolution new rules were<br />
required with regard to the Gentiles. Now in order for the Gentiles to<br />
join the covenant of God with Israel and thus enter the world to come<br />
(as a rabbinic saying has it: the whole of Israel has a share in the world<br />
to come) and be saved from the Last Judgment, it was no longer<br />
necessary to join the covenant of Sinai involving circumcision and the<br />
observance of the "613 commandments" of the Torah, but they could<br />
enter the covenant with the God of Israel through incorporation into<br />
the "body of Christ" and in this way get a share in the world to come.<br />
This understanding of the Resurrection as the eschatological act of<br />
God bringing about the new order of justice, peace, and joy led the<br />
disciples of Jesus to call him "messiah." The majority of the Jewish<br />
community, however, did not perceive that what had happened to<br />
Jesus was the decisive turning point in history and did not share the<br />
conclusions drawn from it by the early Christian community, nor<br />
were they convinced that Jesus was the messiah, since in no way was<br />
the new order coming about.<br />
Now after 1950 years the plain fact is that the divine revolution on<br />
which the early Christian community counted has not materialized.<br />
The church had to abandon the thought that it stood at the end of<br />
history. It continued to live within history, but by doing so it claimed<br />
to continue the history of Israel, to replace the Jewish people as God's<br />
people and to be the "true" or the "new" Israel. Jesus, now<br />
designated with the name "messiah," remained the central figure of<br />
this community, but no longer as the eschatological figure who fulfills<br />
the Torah, but as the normative figure who replaces the Torah, so that<br />
the Torah was no longer the norm, but Jesus Christ became the norm<br />
of thought and action. Although the church maintains that Jesus has<br />
fulfilled the Torah, in reality the Torah remains unfulfilled, because<br />
the new world order of doing justice, loving kindness, and being<br />
humble in going with God has not yet come to humanity.<br />
At this point we meet the Jewish "no" to the claims made by the<br />
church for Jesus. As Friedrich-Wilhelm Marquardt has pointed out,<br />
this Jewish "no" is an expression of Jewish faithfulness to the Torah,<br />
to its God-given calling. This is the dignity of the Jewish "no" to Jesus.<br />
61