19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JEWS AND CHRISTIANS<br />

Central to the Pharisee challenge to the established form of Judaism<br />

after the rebuilding of the Second Temple stood a new outlook on the<br />

relationship between God and the human person. It was one marked<br />

by a notion of a far more personal and intimate divine-human link<br />

than previous expression of Judaism could conceive. This new<br />

perception represented so fundamental a change in religious<br />

consciousness that the Pharisees felt obligated to replace the names<br />

for God found in the Hebrew Scriptures with ones more expressive of<br />

the new union between God and the human family which they had<br />

uncovered. Among the principal names they applied to God was<br />

"Father." While this term has definite limitations in our era because of<br />

its inability to express fully the femininity of God, in its setting it spoke<br />

not of gender superiority but of a heightened sense of the profoundity<br />

of God's link to each individual person.<br />

This new sense of divine-human intimacy ultimately undercut the<br />

basis of the intermediary/hereditary system of religious elitism which<br />

prevailed in the older Sadducean temple/priesthood concept of Jewish<br />

religion, up till then the dominant form of Judaism. As the Pharisees<br />

saw it, all men and women, no matter what their social status or<br />

bloodline, had such standing in the sight of God that they could relate<br />

to God on a personal basis without further need to use the temple<br />

priests as intermediaries. The prominent Jewish scholar on Pharisaism,<br />

Jacob Neusner, has written the following about the ultimate<br />

implications of this aspect of the movement in his volume From Politics<br />

To Piety: The Emergence of Pharisaic Judaism (Prentice-Hall, 1973): "The<br />

Pharisees thus arrogated to themselves—and to all Jews equally—the<br />

status of Temple priests, and performed actions restricted to priests<br />

on account of that status. The table of every Jew in his home was seen<br />

as being like the table of the Lord in the Jerusalem Temple. The<br />

commandment, 'You shall be a kingdom of priests and a holy people,'<br />

was taken literally: everyone is a priest, everyone must keep the<br />

priestly laws."<br />

The consciousness transformation regarding the God-human<br />

relationship led the Pharisees to undertake a major overhaul of the<br />

liturgical, ministerial, and institutional life of Second Temple Judaism<br />

and, in so doing, lay some of the groundwork for the early Christian<br />

church. Picking up the mantle of the prophets, the Pharisees hoped to<br />

translate prophetic ideals into the daily lives of the Jewish people of<br />

their time.<br />

Among the revolutionary changes brought about by the Pharisees<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!