19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />

The Jewish historian Ellis Rivkin has brought out as well as anyone<br />

the connections between Jesus and Judaism relative to the Crucifixion.<br />

He insists that for a proper understanding of Jesus' Crucifixion<br />

we need to replace the question who crucified him with the question<br />

what crucified him. As Rivkin interprets the events, Jesus died a victim<br />

of Roman imperial policy. His death was ordered by the type of<br />

political regime which throughout history has eliminated those who<br />

have stood up for human freedom, insight, and a new way of<br />

understanding human interrelationships. Those Jews who might<br />

have collaborated wth the Romans in Jesus' execution deserve to be<br />

condemned in Rivkin's view. The Jewish masses, however, were<br />

greatly oppressed under the Roman colonial government, so much so<br />

that they would undertake an outright revolt against its tyrannical<br />

authority less than thirty years later. Hence, rather than serving as<br />

The time has come to eliminate the term "Old Testament"<br />

from the Christian vocabulary about the Bible and to use<br />

instead the term "Hebrew Scriptures."<br />

Jesus' executioners, the majority of the Jewish population, insists<br />

Rivkin, saw in his Crucifixion "their own plight of helplessness,<br />

humiliation and subjection."<br />

Another important element in the restoration of the Jewish context<br />

of Christianity is a deeper appreciation within the church of the first<br />

part of our Bible—the Hebrew Scriptures. Too often Christians have<br />

simply looked upon the so-called Old Testament as a prelude to the<br />

spiritual insights found in the New Testament. We need to increase<br />

our consciousness of the Hebrew Scriptures as a source of ongoing<br />

religious meaning for us in their own right, and not merely as a<br />

backdrop for the teaching of Jesus. It is helpful here to recall that for<br />

Jesus and his apostles there was no "Old" Testament. They viewed<br />

the Hebrew Bible as "the Scriptures," as standing at the core of their<br />

religious identity. This is an attitude contemporary Christianity needs<br />

to recapture. Contemporary Christian spirituality and preaching<br />

remain peripherally influenced at best by the Hebrew Scriptures.<br />

The time has come to eliminate the term "Old Testament" from the<br />

Christian vocabulary about the Bible. Though admittedly the word old<br />

can connote "reverence" or "long-standing experience," used in<br />

reference to the first part of the Bible it tends to create an attitude that<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!