Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />
The Jewish historian Ellis Rivkin has brought out as well as anyone<br />
the connections between Jesus and Judaism relative to the Crucifixion.<br />
He insists that for a proper understanding of Jesus' Crucifixion<br />
we need to replace the question who crucified him with the question<br />
what crucified him. As Rivkin interprets the events, Jesus died a victim<br />
of Roman imperial policy. His death was ordered by the type of<br />
political regime which throughout history has eliminated those who<br />
have stood up for human freedom, insight, and a new way of<br />
understanding human interrelationships. Those Jews who might<br />
have collaborated wth the Romans in Jesus' execution deserve to be<br />
condemned in Rivkin's view. The Jewish masses, however, were<br />
greatly oppressed under the Roman colonial government, so much so<br />
that they would undertake an outright revolt against its tyrannical<br />
authority less than thirty years later. Hence, rather than serving as<br />
The time has come to eliminate the term "Old Testament"<br />
from the Christian vocabulary about the Bible and to use<br />
instead the term "Hebrew Scriptures."<br />
Jesus' executioners, the majority of the Jewish population, insists<br />
Rivkin, saw in his Crucifixion "their own plight of helplessness,<br />
humiliation and subjection."<br />
Another important element in the restoration of the Jewish context<br />
of Christianity is a deeper appreciation within the church of the first<br />
part of our Bible—the Hebrew Scriptures. Too often Christians have<br />
simply looked upon the so-called Old Testament as a prelude to the<br />
spiritual insights found in the New Testament. We need to increase<br />
our consciousness of the Hebrew Scriptures as a source of ongoing<br />
religious meaning for us in their own right, and not merely as a<br />
backdrop for the teaching of Jesus. It is helpful here to recall that for<br />
Jesus and his apostles there was no "Old" Testament. They viewed<br />
the Hebrew Bible as "the Scriptures," as standing at the core of their<br />
religious identity. This is an attitude contemporary Christianity needs<br />
to recapture. Contemporary Christian spirituality and preaching<br />
remain peripherally influenced at best by the Hebrew Scriptures.<br />
The time has come to eliminate the term "Old Testament" from the<br />
Christian vocabulary about the Bible. Though admittedly the word old<br />
can connote "reverence" or "long-standing experience," used in<br />
reference to the first part of the Bible it tends to create an attitude that<br />
26