Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />
all Israel at Mt. Sinai and therein lies their special place in Judaism. We<br />
shall, therefore, give attention to some of the Ten Commandments<br />
individually.<br />
"I am the Eternal, your God, who took you<br />
out of the land of Egypt." (Exod. 20:2)<br />
It is the normal course of traditional Jewish thought to express itself<br />
in community or group terms. "All Israel is responsible for one<br />
another" (BT Shebucot 39a) is typical of this pattern of thought as is<br />
the thoroughgoing use of "we" throughout the liturgy. No doubt it is<br />
this tendency of thought that raised the question, "Why were the Ten<br />
Commandments spoken by God in the singular form?" (Pesikta<br />
Rabbati, 21). Many answers have been suggested, but one of the best<br />
of them is that at Sinai God appeared to each individual differently. To<br />
one, God seemed to sit; to another, God seemed to stand. Yet another<br />
perceived God as a youth, while someone else received the revelation<br />
of God as an old man (Pesikta Rabbati, 21). This is not a claim that God<br />
is any one of these, 2 but rather a statement about the need of people to<br />
personalize their experience of God and Judaism's belief that God<br />
agrees to such personalization.<br />
This stance has made Jewish thinking very uncomfortable about<br />
"defining" God too closely. Indeed, it would be considered arrogant<br />
to try to do so. Who are we, mere mortals, to close the divine infinity<br />
into measurements we have set? How do we dare tell others that our<br />
vision of God is the only true vision? In this regard it is interesting how<br />
R. Abrhaham b. David of Posquierres responded to Maimonides's<br />
dogmatic statement that those who believed God has a shape or form<br />
of any sort were heretics (Maimonides's Code, Laws of Penitence,<br />
3:7). He stated:<br />
Why does he call such a person a heretic? How many greater and<br />
better persons than him [Maimonides] accepted such a notion<br />
according to what they saw in biblical texts and even more so from<br />
what they saw in some Jewish lore which confused their minds?<br />
R. Abraham did not believe in God's corporeality, as he himself states,<br />
but neither did he believe that anyone had the right to classify those<br />
who did as heretics. The divine reality appeared to great and good<br />
people in many ways. It was unfair to characterize others' views as<br />
92