19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />

all Israel at Mt. Sinai and therein lies their special place in Judaism. We<br />

shall, therefore, give attention to some of the Ten Commandments<br />

individually.<br />

"I am the Eternal, your God, who took you<br />

out of the land of Egypt." (Exod. 20:2)<br />

It is the normal course of traditional Jewish thought to express itself<br />

in community or group terms. "All Israel is responsible for one<br />

another" (BT Shebucot 39a) is typical of this pattern of thought as is<br />

the thoroughgoing use of "we" throughout the liturgy. No doubt it is<br />

this tendency of thought that raised the question, "Why were the Ten<br />

Commandments spoken by God in the singular form?" (Pesikta<br />

Rabbati, 21). Many answers have been suggested, but one of the best<br />

of them is that at Sinai God appeared to each individual differently. To<br />

one, God seemed to sit; to another, God seemed to stand. Yet another<br />

perceived God as a youth, while someone else received the revelation<br />

of God as an old man (Pesikta Rabbati, 21). This is not a claim that God<br />

is any one of these, 2 but rather a statement about the need of people to<br />

personalize their experience of God and Judaism's belief that God<br />

agrees to such personalization.<br />

This stance has made Jewish thinking very uncomfortable about<br />

"defining" God too closely. Indeed, it would be considered arrogant<br />

to try to do so. Who are we, mere mortals, to close the divine infinity<br />

into measurements we have set? How do we dare tell others that our<br />

vision of God is the only true vision? In this regard it is interesting how<br />

R. Abrhaham b. David of Posquierres responded to Maimonides's<br />

dogmatic statement that those who believed God has a shape or form<br />

of any sort were heretics (Maimonides's Code, Laws of Penitence,<br />

3:7). He stated:<br />

Why does he call such a person a heretic? How many greater and<br />

better persons than him [Maimonides] accepted such a notion<br />

according to what they saw in biblical texts and even more so from<br />

what they saw in some Jewish lore which confused their minds?<br />

R. Abraham did not believe in God's corporeality, as he himself states,<br />

but neither did he believe that anyone had the right to classify those<br />

who did as heretics. The divine reality appeared to great and good<br />

people in many ways. It was unfair to characterize others' views as<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!