19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NEW TESTAMENT RECONSIDERED<br />

religion, but that Judaism necessarily tends towards petty legalism,<br />

self-serving and self-deceiving casuistry, and a mixture of arrogance<br />

and lack of confidence in God. But the surviving Jewish literature is<br />

as free of these characteristics as any I have ever read (Paul and<br />

Palestinian Judaism, p. 427).<br />

What one does find in reading Jewish literature is that the promise<br />

and command of God are always kept in relationship to one another<br />

and that the grace of God in choosing and ultimately redeeming Israel<br />

is strongly emphasized.<br />

Although brief, this description of the anti-Jewish interpretive<br />

scheme provides the backdrop against which the new scholarship can<br />

be represented.<br />

THE PHARISEES<br />

In the anti-Jewish paradigm which has just been reviewed, the<br />

Pharisees are regarded as the chief examples of what went wrong in<br />

Judaism; it was to what they stood for that Paul and Jesus were in total<br />

opposition. Yet in the emerging scholarship it is precisely they whose<br />

reputation is most being refurbished. Two points are involved, one<br />

negative and one positive. Negatively, (a) Paul never mentions<br />

Pharisees as his enemies, and (b) scholars increasingly recognize that<br />

the conflicts between Jesus and the Pharisees in the Gospels are the<br />

products of later hostility between the Pharisee leaders of the<br />

synagogue and the church of the late first century. Writes Norman<br />

Perrin:<br />

So the diatribe against "the scribes and Pharisees" in Matthew 23<br />

does not reflect a conflict between Jesus and the scribes and<br />

Pharisees of his day, but one fifty years later between Matthew and<br />

their descendants spreading their influence from Jamnia. 8<br />

The late first century was a time of desperation and conflict for both<br />

church and synagogue, each threatened by turmoil from within and<br />

by the Roman Empire from without, and the later New Testament<br />

writings reflect the Christian side of this dissension.<br />

The positive point is that in the new scholarship the image of the<br />

Pharisees is drastically improved. Here they are no longer the<br />

polemically targeted "chief heavies" of the New Testament but,<br />

rather, the one group of official Jews (the others being the Sadducees,<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!