Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NEW TESTAMENT RECONSIDERED<br />
tradition. Also, the Pharisees were highly self-critical to the extent that<br />
the criticism of them attributed to Jesus in the Gospels, if authentic,<br />
need be no more than Pharisee self-criticism. In spite of what the<br />
anti-Jewish paradigm says, the Pharisees also laid great stress on the<br />
all-presence of God (the Shekinah) and on the grace of God. 12<br />
A great Jewish scholar of our time, Leo Baeck, a rabbi who survived<br />
Theresienstadt and Hitler's attempted "final solution," sums it up this<br />
way:<br />
Jesus, in all of his traits, is completely a genuine Jewish character. A<br />
man such as he could only grow up on the soil of Judaism.. . . Jesus<br />
is a genuine Jewish personality, all of his striving and acting, his<br />
bearing and feeling, his speech and his silence bear the stamp of the<br />
Jewish manner, the imprint of Jewish idealism, and the best of what<br />
Judaism gave and gives, but what only existed, at that time, in<br />
Judaism. He was a Jew among Jews; out of no other people could a<br />
man such as he have been able to have this effect; in no other people<br />
could he have found the apostles who believed in him. 13<br />
Jesus' ethical teachings seem clearly continuous with those of the<br />
contemporary school of Hillel; when the content differs, the method is<br />
the same. Obviously there is much else in the sayings attributed to<br />
Jesus (eschatology and apocalyptic, the coming kingdom of God and<br />
Jesus' role in that coming) which is beyond the scope of our discussion<br />
here. The argument is not that Jesus was just another Pharisee or that<br />
he was in no way different from them. Precision in this matter is<br />
probably beyond the reach of possibility.<br />
The following do seem to be fair conclusions: (a) a more objective<br />
view of the Pharisees results in a more favorable and less biased<br />
picture of them; (b) the conflicts portrayed in the Gospels between<br />
Jesus and the Pharisees are retrojected from the embattled situation of<br />
the later first-century church; (c) ministers of the gospel should<br />
familiarize themselves with this new scholarship on the Pharisees and<br />
cease perpetuating negative images of the forebears of the synagogue<br />
across the street; and (d) the good news of God is expressed in every<br />
pericope of the Gospels, including the conflict stories. This good news<br />
is what we should preach and teach, the promise of the love of God for<br />
each and all and the command of God for justice to each and all.<br />
PAUL<br />
When we turn to the Apostle Paul, we find a wealth of scholarship<br />
which takes a new look at the apostle to the Gentiles. 14 In spite of this<br />
43