19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />

us to see clearly to whom and therefore to what problem Paul was<br />

writing. Paul never wrote a letter to a synagogue of Jews advocating<br />

that they abandon the Torah. He did write against Gentiles infatuated<br />

with Jewish ways and intent on playing at being Jews and frequently<br />

his criticism of them was itself quite Jewish: "Circumcision indeed is<br />

of value if you obey the law; but if you break the law, your<br />

circumcision becomes uncircumcision" (Rom. 2:25).<br />

According to J. Christiaan Beker in his Paul the Apostle: The Triumph<br />

of God in Life and Thought, the model of Paul as the originator of catholic<br />

Christianity was the model of Paul as having liberated Christianity<br />

"from its so-called Jewish limitations. Paul the catholic theologian was<br />

the 'universalist,' and the key to his achievement was his antipathy to<br />

everything Jewish" (p. 339). Beker declares that "this popular picture<br />

of Paul as the originator of catholic dogma and the enemy of Judaism<br />

is completely erroneous" (p. 340). Contrary to the traditional view,<br />

Beker comments frequently upon Paul's "lack of narcissistic<br />

self-concern and introspection," and on his reticence "about his<br />

conversion experience" as contrasted with the fact that Paul was<br />

"extremely outspoken about his apostleship" (pp. 4-5). He attributes<br />

much of the interest in Paul's "conversion" to turn-of-the-century<br />

scholarship with "its strong psychological and romantic interests"<br />

and contends instead that Paul is preoccupied by his call to the<br />

apostolate and gospel as service to the world (pp. 6, 8,10). It is Beker<br />

who points out, illuminatingly, that Paul never speaks of Christ as<br />

having "fulfilled" the promises of God to Israel. In place of such an<br />

expression, Paul says that Christ "became a servant to the circumcised<br />

to show God's truthfulness, in order to confirm the promises given to<br />

the patriarchs, and in order that the Gentiles might glorify God for his<br />

mercy" (Rom. 15:8-9). The verb bebaidsai is "to ratify or confirm."<br />

Also, Beker points out that Paul maintains a tension between God<br />

and Christ, so that Christ is never "fused" with God (p. 344). For<br />

instance, Paul tells the Corinthians, "Let no one boast of men. For all<br />

things are yours. . . and you are Christ's, and Christ is God's" (I Cor.<br />

3:21,23). Paul's is a theocentric, not christocentric, christology. Paul's<br />

christology is affirmed against the prospect or horizon of God's final<br />

eschatological kingdom "that will break into history and transform all<br />

creation in accord with the messianic promises" (p. 345), a<br />

consummation which will take place only with Israel's participation in<br />

it. These natural olive branches will be grafted back "into their own<br />

olive tree" (Rom. 11:24; emphasis mine).<br />

The works of Markus Barth, W. D. Davies, and E. P. Sanders are<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!