Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />
overcome the dismissals and divisiveness which weaken the role of<br />
both religions. I turn to Christians in trust and love and depend on<br />
them to prevent triumphalist abuses. Failure to prevent would only<br />
prove that Christianity is not a valid hermeneutic on the biblical<br />
covenant. It would suggest that the sum of woe brought into the<br />
world by Christianity will go on and on, undermining its claim to be a<br />
legitimate major step forward on the road to redemption.<br />
By the same token, many Christians will find the concept that God<br />
called Jewry to a new level of relationship in the covenant a denial of<br />
their own belief in Christ as the ultimate event. I do not underestimate<br />
the challenge in giving up the monopoly claims or in recognizing<br />
Judaism as a form of independently valid relationship to God. Yet,<br />
this model offers the affirmation of the fullest possibilities of Christ:<br />
from God Incarnate to prophet or messiah or teacher—freed at least of<br />
the incubus of hatred and monopolistic claims of owning God. For this<br />
model to work, Jews as well as Christians will have to have faith in the<br />
sufficiency of God's capacity to offer love enough for everyone and<br />
that the Lord who is the Makom/Place, who is "the ground of all<br />
existence" has many messengers.<br />
IN A NEW ERA: AFTER MODERNITY AND<br />
AFTER HOLOCAUST AND REBIRTH OF ISRAEL<br />
The history which both religions denied in order to claim their own<br />
absolute validity came back to haunt them. In the modern period, the<br />
revolt of humans against oppression, suffering, and inequality led to<br />
an enormous growth of secularism and rejection of religion. Both<br />
Christianity and Judaism lost serious ground to revolt in the name of<br />
the very goal they were pledged to achieve in the first place. And both<br />
faiths were forced back into history by the overwhelming weight of<br />
modern culture and scholarship which continually dug at their<br />
claimed foundations, i.e., transcendent extrahistorical truth. Modern<br />
scholarship insisted that the denial of history is false. Revelation is in<br />
history. To deny that, one must ignore or contradict archeology,<br />
anthropology, sociology, philosophy, history, which is to say, to be<br />
judged to be false, nonfactual, by the standards of modern culture.<br />
Reluctantly but inexorably, both religions have been forced to<br />
confront their own historicity.<br />
An event of great historical magnitude has now gone beyond<br />
modernity in pushing faith back into the maelstrom of history. In the<br />
Holocaust, Jews discovered they had no choice but to go back into<br />
18