19.03.2015 Views

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />

because humanity is created in the image of God (Gen. 9:6). Rabbinic<br />

sources adopt the same approach when they state:<br />

It is written, "I am the Eternal, your God" and over against this it is<br />

written, "You shall not murder." Torah testifies that one who<br />

murders is regarded as one who lessened the Image of the King. . .<br />

(Mekilta, Bahodesh, 5).<br />

This concern for the value of a life because each life is unique, i.e.,<br />

each human life is "one" just as God is "one," meaning without peer<br />

(compare Exod. 15:11), led to a deepening of the meaning of "You<br />

shall not murder." Indeed, the sense of the value of the individual<br />

finally prompted the rabbinic legal tradition to re-evaluate the<br />

question of the meaning of capital punishment. This led to a change in<br />

the sense of capital punishment's purpose which, for the Bible, is<br />

either retaliation, deterrent, or the maintenance of an orderly society<br />

(Lev. 24:17-22; Deut. 17:6-7, 12-13). For the rabbis, however, capital<br />

punishment was part of a program of repentance. Violation of those<br />

laws in the Torah which required the death penalty were sins needing<br />

atonement. Hence, "those sentenced to death confess" (Mishnah,<br />

Sanhedrin 6:2) because their death is their atonement and is<br />

efficacious only when accompanied by penitence.<br />

This new sense of what capital punishment represented, as well as<br />

further consideration of the concept of the image of God, pressed<br />

some rabbis toward the conclusion that capital punishment should be<br />

avoided even in cases where the Torah might require it. From their<br />

perspective, the Torah could be construed to demand total certainty<br />

that a crime carrying the death penalty was committed with criminal<br />

intent and awareness of the penalty. Furthermore, the Torah's<br />

concern for careful examination of witnesses in death penalty cases<br />

(Deut. 19:18) could serve as the basis of such meticulous scrutiny that<br />

no two witnesses could produce equivalent evidence except in the<br />

rarest cases. Both "strategies" were employed, and the end result is<br />

found in a statement by R. Akiba, one of the greatest sages of rabbinic<br />

Judaism (ca. 90-135): "Had I been a member of the Court when it was<br />

empowered to impose the death penalty, no person would have been<br />

put to death" (Mishnah, Makkot, 1:10).<br />

The process we have described does not abolish the Torah's law of<br />

capital punishment. Given rabbinic theology, that could not happen.<br />

Rather, some rabbis interpreted certain requirements of the Torah<br />

stringently, for example, the laws of testimony, in order to make<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!