Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Winter 1984 - 1985 - Quarterly Review
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
QUARTERLY REVIEW, WINTER <strong>1984</strong><br />
because humanity is created in the image of God (Gen. 9:6). Rabbinic<br />
sources adopt the same approach when they state:<br />
It is written, "I am the Eternal, your God" and over against this it is<br />
written, "You shall not murder." Torah testifies that one who<br />
murders is regarded as one who lessened the Image of the King. . .<br />
(Mekilta, Bahodesh, 5).<br />
This concern for the value of a life because each life is unique, i.e.,<br />
each human life is "one" just as God is "one," meaning without peer<br />
(compare Exod. 15:11), led to a deepening of the meaning of "You<br />
shall not murder." Indeed, the sense of the value of the individual<br />
finally prompted the rabbinic legal tradition to re-evaluate the<br />
question of the meaning of capital punishment. This led to a change in<br />
the sense of capital punishment's purpose which, for the Bible, is<br />
either retaliation, deterrent, or the maintenance of an orderly society<br />
(Lev. 24:17-22; Deut. 17:6-7, 12-13). For the rabbis, however, capital<br />
punishment was part of a program of repentance. Violation of those<br />
laws in the Torah which required the death penalty were sins needing<br />
atonement. Hence, "those sentenced to death confess" (Mishnah,<br />
Sanhedrin 6:2) because their death is their atonement and is<br />
efficacious only when accompanied by penitence.<br />
This new sense of what capital punishment represented, as well as<br />
further consideration of the concept of the image of God, pressed<br />
some rabbis toward the conclusion that capital punishment should be<br />
avoided even in cases where the Torah might require it. From their<br />
perspective, the Torah could be construed to demand total certainty<br />
that a crime carrying the death penalty was committed with criminal<br />
intent and awareness of the penalty. Furthermore, the Torah's<br />
concern for careful examination of witnesses in death penalty cases<br />
(Deut. 19:18) could serve as the basis of such meticulous scrutiny that<br />
no two witnesses could produce equivalent evidence except in the<br />
rarest cases. Both "strategies" were employed, and the end result is<br />
found in a statement by R. Akiba, one of the greatest sages of rabbinic<br />
Judaism (ca. 90-135): "Had I been a member of the Court when it was<br />
empowered to impose the death penalty, no person would have been<br />
put to death" (Mishnah, Makkot, 1:10).<br />
The process we have described does not abolish the Torah's law of<br />
capital punishment. Given rabbinic theology, that could not happen.<br />
Rather, some rabbis interpreted certain requirements of the Torah<br />
stringently, for example, the laws of testimony, in order to make<br />
96