30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which witnesses to pursue, but continued meeting with anyone who would talk substantively, as we<br />

grappled with myriad entities and increasing complexity unique in our experience. Many times we<br />

received information that had no seeming relevance – or at least we did not yet know enough about<br />

how Enron did business to evaluate the relevance of the information we received. Coordinating the<br />

efforts of interviewing investigators, database researchers, and staff doing locate and employmentconfirmation<br />

calls required continued reevaluation, while ongoing research to identify prospective<br />

witnesses expanded to include – beyond Enron, Andersen and Vinson & Elkins (“V&E”) –<br />

McKinsey Consulting, Andrews & Kurth (“A&K”), Dynegy, and a growing list of energy-sector<br />

traders, companies and counterparties to transactions, which would lead us, ultimately, to investigate<br />

Enron’s banks.<br />

40. We continued with witness interviews and database research on underwater EES<br />

contracts, the California energy crisis and dark-fiber swaps for EBS. One of our lawyers traveled to<br />

New Orleans to talk with a former internal auditor who investigated the rogue trading operation in<br />

Valhalla, New York, in 1987. This was the best in a series of sessions with internal auditors. They<br />

told us how their group reported to Kenneth Lay (“Lay”) and a Board member that he had no choice<br />

but to fire the two New York trading executives for criminal conduct, let alone a serious conflict of<br />

interest. They were stunned by Lay’s response: Take away their administrative duties, but let them<br />

continue trading because they are making the Company too much money and we can’t disappoint the<br />

shareholders. These internal auditors proved invaluable as direct sources and in pointing the<br />

investigative team to the right people and helping us ask the right questions. Through this group we<br />

learned crucial details, later pleaded in the Consolidated Complaint, about over-budget international<br />

deals and how executives padded true construction costs to provide for their huge bonuses – none of<br />

which was ever shared with the engineers and construction crews that did their best to make the<br />

projects work. And we learned the hows and whys of Enron’s overpaying for virtually all of its<br />

- 25 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!