30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

previously noticed.” Order on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Westboro #14) and Plaintiffs’ Motion<br />

to Compel Deutsche Bank to Refrain from <strong>In</strong>structing Witnesses During Questions (Docket No. 364<br />

in Case No. H-02-1446) at 4. The Court also ordered Deutsche Bank to stop improperly coaching<br />

witnesses during oral examination.<br />

14. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel Challenges the “Advice of Counsel” Defense<br />

163. On May 20, 2005, <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel moved for an expedited order forcing defendants to<br />

either (a) within five days, explicitly and unambiguously notify <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff in writing they waived<br />

the advice of counsel defense, or (b) within ten days, produce all attorney-client communications<br />

concerning Enron-related transactions for which they sought advice of counsel, answer <strong>Lead</strong><br />

Plaintiff’s interrogatories requesting the basis for the defense, and allow deposition questioning<br />

concerning the legal advice at all future depositions (Docket No. 3502). <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel argued the<br />

financial institutions avoided disclosing documents purportedly attorney-client privileged, yet at the<br />

same time asserted an advice of counsel defense. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel argued the defendants could not<br />

have it both ways: assertion of advice of counsel defense operated as a subject-matter waiver of the<br />

attorney-client privilege as to all communications with counsel.<br />

164. The bank defendants filed a response on May 24, 2005, arguing expedited<br />

consideration was unnecessary, a full briefing schedule was preferred because the issue was<br />

complex, and arguing the court in WorldCom did not compel defendants to make an election or<br />

waiver until just six weeks before trial (Docket No. 3506).<br />

165. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel’s motion was successful. On June 20, 2005, the Court signed a<br />

stipulation among the parties that required defendants to inform <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff about any aspect of a<br />

transaction, or complaint allegation, for which the financial institution intends to assert the defense<br />

of reliance on its own counsel (Docket No. 3619). If asserting the reliance on counsel defense, the<br />

financial institutions also agreed to produce all communications previously withheld on the basis of<br />

- 90 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!