30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Protocol Order provided for the orderly noticing and scheduling of depositions, the length of the<br />

depositions, and limitation on deposition days<br />

159. The Deposition Protocol Order also provided for the predesignation of deposition<br />

content and documents, a key provision that facilitated the taking of myriad depositions involving<br />

hundreds of thousands of exhibits. The Order further established protocols for the taking of Fifth<br />

Amendment depositions by witnesses who intended to assert their right to not answer questions<br />

under oath.<br />

160. The Deposition Protocol Order was a remarkable achievement and an important<br />

agreement and compromise among highly adversarial parties with, literally, billions of dollars at<br />

stake. It conserved litigant resources, prevented the Court from being unnecessarily involved in<br />

discovery disputes, and allowed for the orderly oral examination of hundreds of fact witnesses in the<br />

litigation.<br />

13. Compelling Knowledgeable Rule 30(b)(6) Witnesses to Appear<br />

for Deposition<br />

161. On September 12, 2005, <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff and <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel joined other plaintiffs in a<br />

motion to compel defendant Deutsche Bank to produce knowledgeable Rule 30(b)(6) deponents and<br />

to refrain from improperly coaching witnesses during deposition (Docket No. 341 in Case No. H-02-<br />

1446). <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel argued Deutsche Bank’s Rule 30(b)(6) designee concerning Enron transactions<br />

had never worked at Deutsche Bank, did not work on the Enron-related transactions, had not<br />

reviewed important documents concerning the transactions, and was unprepared to respond to<br />

questions concerning the transactions. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel also complained about the improper coaching<br />

of witnesses, violating the Deposition Protocol Order as well as the federal discovery rules.<br />

162. On November 2, 2005, the Court ruled in <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff’s and <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel’s favor<br />

(Docket No. 364 in Case No. H-02-1446). The Court ordered Deutsche Bank to “designate and<br />

present a knowledgeable 30(b)(6) witness on each and every one of the matters and transactions<br />

- 89 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!