30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

need to ask the same witnesses the same questions again. With this information we can streamline<br />

the depositions that we take.” <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Banks to Produce the Sworn<br />

Statements and Deposition Transcripts of Their Employees at 2. And <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel argued the<br />

sworn statements were prior testimony that was discoverable and also admissible at trial as<br />

impeachment evidence.<br />

156. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel succeeded in obtaining the sworn testimony. On March 15, 2004, the<br />

Court ordered that all bank defendants “produce to <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff copies of all deposition transcripts<br />

and/or sworn statements relating to the investigation by the Court Appointed Bankruptcy Examiner<br />

in the Enron Bankruptcy.” 3/15/04 Order on Motions to Compel the Banks to Produce the Sworn<br />

Statements and Deposition Transcripts of Their Employees (Docket No. 2021) at 5. The Court<br />

agreed having the transcripts and statements would allow oral examinations to be streamlined, and<br />

the statements could be used as “impeachment tools.” Id. The Court further agreed with certain of<br />

the Outside Directors, who had argued fairness dictates that all parties have access to nonprivileged<br />

information. The sworn statements were produced to the document depository and used by the<br />

parties to narrow the oral examination topics and to impeach witnesses.<br />

12. The Parties Agree to a Deposition Protocol Order<br />

157. <strong>In</strong> addition to the establishing a document depository, <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel also was<br />

instrumental in establishing orderly procedures for the oral examination of fact witnesses in the<br />

litigation. These procedures conserved judicial and litigant resources, significantly reduced<br />

scheduling conflicts, and maximized the efficient use of the discovery days allotted by the Court.<br />

158. On March 11, 2004, the Court entered an order approving <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel’s and<br />

counsel for the various defendants’ agreed-upon protocol governing oral depositions of fact<br />

witnesses in the litigation (Docket No. 2018). The Deposition Protocol Order established<br />

depositions would begin on June 2, 2004 and continue through November 30, 2005. The Deposition<br />

- 88 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!