30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

133. Document requests and subpoenas to defendants and third parties, and interviews of<br />

former Enron employees and others resulted in <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel receiving, coding and processing, and<br />

analyzing terabytes of data – tens of millions of pages of documents (in hard-copy and electronic<br />

format). The gargantuan volume of documents, millions produced on an ever-rolling basis, required<br />

a massive and sustained effort led by the staff and lawyers in Houston, utilizing two shifts of coding<br />

teams and analysts in the trial office. The document-review effort included work by forensic<br />

experts, paralegals, consultants, and lawyers to literally sort, identify, cull, de-duplicate, extract data<br />

from and then analyze, pertinent documents from electronic databases from all defendants and third<br />

parties for more in-depth review and use in depositions and pre-trial preparation. The effort required<br />

an organized approach to staff the coding and analytic teams, prepare for and receive the documents,<br />

create the database and shepherd the coding process, and build hundreds of transaction and witness<br />

binders – nine-inch volumes – for all potential deponents and trial witnesses. Our abilities, patience,<br />

and perseverance were tested by unique, at first, and later, routine electronic complexities presented<br />

by the colossal volume of documents we received, organized, reviewed, analyzed and utilized.<br />

6. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel’s <strong>In</strong>terrogatories and Motions to Compel<br />

Responses<br />

134. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel vigorously pursued interrogatory discovery. The first of several sets of<br />

interrogatory discovery was served in May 2003. The interrogatories requested detailed information<br />

from the financial institutions and others concerning the nature of their business relationship with<br />

Enron, the names and positions of employees who participated in Enron-related transactions, and<br />

fees earned from the transactions. The interrogatories also probed the affirmative defenses,<br />

including reliance on advice of counsel and the assigning of liability to third parties.<br />

135. <strong>Lead</strong> Counsel also held numerous meet and confer sessions with the financial<br />

institutions to compel further responses, especially where defendants either delayed in responding to<br />

questions pending the completion of discovery, or simply refused to answer the interrogatories.<br />

- 81 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!