30.03.2015 Views

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

Declaration Of Helen J. Hodges In Support Of Lead Counsel's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

finance certain of the partnerships Enron controlled and their illicit transactions with SPEs –<br />

including LJM2 – knowing they were vehicles being utilized by Enron to falsify its reported<br />

financial results; and also engaged in numerous deceptive transactions with Enron to disguise<br />

billions of dollars in loans to Enron. <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff also argued that the complaint properly pled<br />

scienter as to JPMorgan, and also adequately alleged claims against JPMorgan under the TSA. The<br />

Court ruled that <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff’s Consolidated Complaint stated a claim against this defendant with<br />

its allegations that JPMorgan made repeated “loans” of about $5 billion to Enron between 1997 and<br />

2000 which were disguised as commodities trades, was extensively involved in structuring<br />

fraudulent Enron transactions with Enron, and failed to disclose certain transactions, and issued<br />

analyst reports on Enron containing material misrepresentations. See Enron, 235 F. Supp. 2d at 695-<br />

97.<br />

(d)<br />

Deutsche Bank AG (Docket No. 716) argued for dismissal because the<br />

complaint failed to plead scienter or materiality; Deutsche Bank’s allegedly fraudulent analyst<br />

reports did not make assertions of fact; the complaint was not pled in conformity with Rule 8; and<br />

the complaint failed to state a claim for control person liability. On June 10, 2002, <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff<br />

filed a 109-page opposition to Deutsche Bank’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 848), arguing that<br />

Deutsche Bank faced liability because it sold Enron and Enron-related securities to investors via<br />

false Registration Statements; issued false analysts’ reports on Enron; employed manipulative and<br />

deceptive devices; and participated in a scheme to defraud purchasers of Enron’s securities. <strong>Lead</strong><br />

Plaintiff highlighted its allegations that Deutsche Bank participated in loans and lending<br />

commitments of over $2 billion to Enron; and helped raise over $5 billion for Enron via the sale of<br />

Enron and Enron-related securities. <strong>Lead</strong> Plaintiff also argued that the complaint properly pled<br />

scienter as to Deutsche Bank. The Court dismissed the claims against Deutsche Bank. See Enron,<br />

235 F. Supp. 2d at 704.<br />

- 41 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!