February 2013 - PESC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FEB RUA RY 2 013 Th e STANDARD NEWS A ND C OM M ENTA RY ON T EC HNOL OGY & STA NDA RDS IN EDUCA T ION provider should offer clear explanations of the privacy implications of students' choices." Students should also own the intellectual-property rights to any content they create by participating in online courses, the authors add. And online providers that offer the promise of some kind of credential or badge for completing coursework should be able to give students some indication of its "authenticity, meaning, and possible recognition by others." Reorienting the Conversation The best-known signatory of the "bill of rights" is also perhaps its most surprising. To the extent that the document regards for-profit purveyors of online education as a potential threat to students' rights, Mr. Thrun would seem to be the subject of the authors' demands, in addition to being an author himself. The Udacity founder said he had no objection to that. He said he wanted to reorient the conversation about MOOCs to focus on pedagogy rather than economics. "It's time for people to speak up [about] what the pedagogical objective really is, because we are trapped in a world that is excited about the enrollment numbers" primarily, Mr. Thrun said in an interview. Mr. Thrun, whose company makes money by helping companies recruit students who have opted into Udacity's job-placement program, said he hoped the proposed bill of rights would put pressure on the education-services industry, but also on traditional colleges and universities. When it comes to how they determine prices for online courses and where students' money goes, he said, some institutions are less than forthcoming. "There's a whole bunch of universities that use online education as a cash cow," said Mr. Thrun. "One of the questions that has arisen is that, if you can actually save money online, can you pass along those savings to the student?" Andrew Ng, a co-founder of Coursera, another forprofit MOOC provider, said he too was pleased by the idea of articulating and respecting the rights of online students. "The idea of listing some of the rights we'd like to confer to students is a good one," he said via e- mail. "Fortunately, today's MOOC movement is already led by many of the world's top universities, which are used to serving students and respecting students' rights." HIGHER ED’S BIGGEST PROBLEM: WHAT’S IT FOR? By Jeff Selingo The release this week of a bill of rights for learning in the digital age was criticized by some who said the document had been put together by a group that didn’t include the very people it is meant to protect: students. The problem is, there is no traditional learner anymore. What’s more, we no longer even have a common definition of “higher education.” The lack of consensus about what the higher-education system in the United States should be producing is largely to blame for the pressures facing colleges and universities today, from lagging financial support to proving their value to students and parents. We desperately need some sort of rallying cry, akin to the post-World War II period of the GI Bill, the late-1950s space race, or the introduction of the modern financial-aid programs with the first Higher Education Act, in 1965. The lack of consensus, which dates back several decades now, has resulted in a lack of public support for higher education, especially public colleges and universities. 14 PESC UNLOC K ING T HE P OW ER OF DATA
FEB RUA RY 2 013 Th e STANDARD NEWS A ND C OM M ENTA RY ON T EC HNOL OGY & STA NDA RDS IN EDUCA T ION Take flagship institutions, for example. As those campuses have relied less on public subsidies, their missions have shifted, especially when it comes to the number of in-state residents they serve. President Obama has attempted to start a national dialogue by calling for the United States to lead the world in its proportion of people with college credentials. While getting students to complete a degree or certificate rather than just accumulate credits is a worthy goal, simply pushing more people through colleges and universities is not the definition of a successful higher-education system in the minds of most experts. What is needed to truly serve the students of the future—and where state and federal leaders could really lend a hand—is to make the system more flexible for the next generation of learners and the institutions that serve them. Despite all the talk about how today’s traditional student is yesterday’s nontraditional student, we still have a financial-aid and regulatory system built on a one-size-fits-all model, with 15-week semesters and credit based on time spent in a classroom seat. As a result, it is difficult for institutions to consider new ways of serving the diverse needs of today’s students. My concern with all the news-media attention MOOCs are getting right now is that it is crowding out informed discussions of other innovative solutions to improve learning and control costs. One model that is getting scant attention, for instance, despite growing interest from traditional universities, is competency-based degrees. This year three traditional universities—Northern Arizona, Southern New Hampshire, and the Wisconsin system—are experimenting with degrees based on competencies. Officials at all three institutions believe a program based on what a student knows rather than seat time is the only way to begin clearing the logjam of time-pressed adults who need a postsecondary education. Building the programs, however, has required those officials to work alongside their accreditors and the Education Department to get around a myriad of rules. Those rules, of course, are designed to protect students and attach integrity to a college degree. But surely we can build a system that is both flexible and accountable. Otherwise there is little incentive for college leaders to follow a different path than the institutions ahead of them, or to look radically different. “Our students have all the information that we have as professors,” says Aaron Brower, special assistant to the president of the University of Wisconsin system (and a professor on the Madison campus). “So there is no premium on access to information.” Indeed, the whole notion of how students acquire information, toggling between devices and sources and working collaboratively, has transformed the learning process. The question now is how to build an educational system around this new information ecosystem. “It gives us the chance to put learning outcomes first and provides the opportunity for individual instruction,” Brower says. It also gives us the chance to build consensus around a diverse higher-education system that is flexible and responsive—yet accountable—to a generation of learners where one mode of teaching no longer fits all and where face-to-face, hybrid, and online-only education can perhaps peacefully coexist. 2013-2014 APPLICATION PROCESSING SPECS FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS William Leith, Service Director, Program Management, Federal Student Aid We are pleased to announce the posting of the final 2013-2014 Application Processing System 15 PESC UNLOC K ING T HE P OW ER OF DATA
Page 1 and 2: FEBRUARY 201 3 NEWS AND COMMENTARY
Page 3 and 4: FEB RUA RY 2 013 Th e STANDARD NEWS
Page 9 and 10: REGISTRATION FORM Spring 2013 Data
Page 11 and 12: Spring 2013 Data Summit Sessions at
Page 17 and 18: EDUNIFY SUPPORTED BY EXPER IENCE. T
Page 19: FEB RUA RY 2 013 Th e STANDARD NEWS
Page 43 and 44: Dr. Lingenfelter’s keynote addres
Page 45 and 46: Past winners of PESC’s Annual Bes
Page 47 and 48: Summary of Activities, Meetings and
Page 49 and 50: September and October 2012 Report f
Page 57 and 58: November and December 2012 Report f
Page 65 and 66: 2 THE CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Page 67 and 68: The entire content in this report,
Page 69 and 70: 4 Overview of Results Knowing what
Page 71 and 72:
6 when the majority of IT staffs we
Page 73 and 74:
8 In 2012, CIOs most often reported
Page 75 and 76:
10 New to the study in 2012 is a qu
Page 77 and 78:
12 of institutions either are plann
Page 79 and 80:
14 Course Management Systems Report
Page 81 and 82:
16 Do you outsource e-mail for facu
Page 83 and 84:
18 respondents hesitating on the
Page 85 and 86:
20 Cloud Computing Influencers by S
Page 87 and 88:
22 Summary and Methodology Although
Page 91 and 92:
Dr. Michael Zastrocky, Executive Di
Page 93 and 94:
Page 1 of 1 http://mail.pesc.org/ex
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99:
i i i i i i
Page 102 and 103:
THE COMPANY Spartan College of Aero
Page 104 and 105:
Completion and Placement Rates Accr
Page 106 and 107:
• Assist in refining and/or estab
Page 108:
other’s) performance and to devel
show all

February 2013 - PESC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?