Bexhill Town Profile - Rother District Council
Bexhill Town Profile - Rother District Council
Bexhill Town Profile - Rother District Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Option 3:<br />
Coordinated development at <strong>Bexhill</strong> and on the edge of<br />
Hastings. Rather than focus on <strong>Bexhill</strong> simply in terms of its<br />
own urban needs and potentials, this proposes taking a holistic<br />
view of the needs and opportunities of <strong>Bexhill</strong> and Hastings,<br />
especially in terms of their combined potential for regeneration.<br />
Improved connectivity between the towns is important with<br />
development well related to both in terms of linkages.<br />
Figure 7: Options for <strong>Bexhill</strong><br />
Central<br />
Maintain<br />
<strong>Bexhill</strong>’s<br />
role<br />
Expand<br />
<strong>Bexhill</strong>’s<br />
role<br />
Coordinated<br />
approach<br />
to the <strong>Bexhill</strong>/<br />
Hastings<br />
area<br />
Scale<br />
of<br />
growth<br />
Low -<br />
medium<br />
Large<br />
Medium<br />
- large<br />
Main areas of<br />
change<br />
North-east and<br />
north-west<br />
<strong>Bexhill</strong><br />
North and west<br />
<strong>Bexhill</strong><br />
<strong>Bexhill</strong> town<br />
centre<br />
North <strong>Bexhill</strong><br />
and west<br />
Hastings;<br />
Pebsham Park;<br />
Bulverhythe;<br />
Ravenside<br />
Source: Urban Options Paper November 2008<br />
Strategy emphases<br />
Efficient urban area,<br />
including town<br />
centre;<br />
Regeneration of<br />
parts<br />
of town, its facilities<br />
and environment<br />
Strong identity;<br />
Growth areas;<br />
New transport<br />
infrastructure;<br />
Retail growth;<br />
New facilities;<br />
Major public realm<br />
projects;<br />
A shared catchment;<br />
‘Green heart’;<br />
Cross-boundary<br />
infrastructure,<br />
including Wilting<br />
Station and bus<br />
corridors<br />
Strengths/<br />
weaknesses<br />
Strengths:<br />
Retains town<br />
character;<br />
Low risk/ low<br />
interventions;<br />
Weaknesses:<br />
Limited economic/<br />
demographic<br />
change<br />
Strengths:<br />
Supports<br />
demographic<br />
change;<br />
Meets growth<br />
agenda;<br />
Weaknesses:<br />
Relies on investment<br />
in<br />
roads, etc;<br />
High scale of job<br />
creation<br />
Strengths:<br />
Efficiencies in<br />
delivering<br />
facilities<br />
Joint “voice”<br />
Weaknesses:<br />
Weakens identity of<br />
town<br />
3.18 The Urban Options Paper considered these options against Sustainability<br />
Objectives and are summarised below:<br />
3.19 ‘Option 1 should have positive effects for housing, health, social inclusion,<br />
accessibility and protecting and enhancing the character of the town. As the<br />
strategic growth areas are all greenfield land, the option would be likely to<br />
have adverse effects on biodiversity and the efficient use of land. The new<br />
road associated with this option may in the short to medium term help relieve<br />
congestion; in the long term there are likely to be negative effects on air<br />
pollution and it does not reduce car usage. There would be less overall<br />
scope for economic turnaround’.<br />
3.20 ‘Option 2 presents significant opportunities for providing affordable homes,<br />
improving health, deprivation, accessibility, educational attainment and for<br />
meeting the regional aspiration for economic growth in the Sussex Coast Sub<br />
19