17.11.2012 Views

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

meaning that there are fourteen countries where newborns have a better<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> survival than in the United States. <strong>The</strong>se countries are those<br />

that depend more on natural medicine, homeopathy, and prevention<br />

techniques. Perhaps these types <strong>of</strong> analyses can open up the closed<br />

minds <strong>of</strong> the so-called traditional statisticians to realize that perhaps<br />

there is an alternative.<br />

Legal judgments can be based on incomplete scientific ideas. It must<br />

be accepted that the science <strong>of</strong> medicine is a pseudo-science; it is not an<br />

exact philosophy. With this in mind, we should be slow to write laws that<br />

prohibit or discourage different philosophies <strong>of</strong> medicine.<br />

Practitioners and patients have the right to make choices. Medical<br />

boards and peer groups are not needed to challenge practitioners who try<br />

to take philosophies and practices and push them into areas where they<br />

do not have strong scientific validity. <strong>The</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> each state for the<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> medicine are vital, and medical board inquiries are essential<br />

in developing better and better qualities <strong>of</strong> medicine. Yet in the pro<strong>of</strong> that<br />

a doctor is doing something wrong with unconventional techniques, as in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> Warren Levin, who was challenged because <strong>of</strong> two separate<br />

instances, it should become quickly apparent that one should not jump<br />

to conclusions on one or two cases <strong>of</strong> impropriety. No doctor in the land<br />

could withstand such a shifted bias. Whereas one or two cases out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

thousands seen over a ten-year period should put a person’s practice on<br />

the line. Statistics must be looked at as well, and looked at for a certain<br />

percentage, wherein a doctor might be brought out in front <strong>of</strong> a peer<br />

group, and the peer group also should be able to express different<br />

opinions.<br />

Many people with medical minds are firmly entrenched in<br />

reductionism, synthetic chemistry and surgery, who make tremendous<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> money for the industries that they promote. Yet people die<br />

every day <strong>of</strong> iatrogenic diseases resulting from surgery and synthetic<br />

drugs. Society has found a way to let these doctors <strong>of</strong>f the hook, and yet<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!