17.11.2012 Views

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

The Natural Repertory of Prof. William Nelson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“stupid body” is given an MAO inhibitor; if there is fever, the “stupid<br />

body” is given an anti-pyretic. In other words, the concept <strong>of</strong> allopathy is<br />

that something is wrong with the body and that outside intervention<br />

from a superior intellectual source will help correct the problem. This<br />

also is a seriously flawed philosophy and psychological backdrop to<br />

which all <strong>of</strong> the medical experiments are then interred.<br />

With homeopathy and naturopathy as a basis in medicine, we can<br />

develop a different foundation. Our foundation will revere the natural<br />

process, and realize our inability to know intimately such a process. We<br />

would want to intervene on the process very little, and try to stimulate<br />

the process back to its own natural balance using natural mechanisms<br />

and gentle nudges to help stimulate the organism to achieve its own<br />

balance. <strong>The</strong> organism has the superior knowledge <strong>of</strong> biology.<br />

If we take such a philosophy, and reevaluate the last hundred years <strong>of</strong><br />

medical research, we can see that some <strong>of</strong> the conclusions drawn from<br />

allopathy were severely flawed. An overview <strong>of</strong> the medical research will<br />

show us that many <strong>of</strong> the experiments performed were reductionistic and<br />

philosophically inadequate.<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> this book has been written with the idea that there is an<br />

evolution in human thought, and that human thought has evolved from<br />

many different states. It is wrong for us to think that human thought<br />

and social conditions have stayed the same through the years. <strong>The</strong> early<br />

tribes and societies had very weak ideas <strong>of</strong> philosophy and the ideation <strong>of</strong><br />

a king becoming part god showed some <strong>of</strong> the limitations <strong>of</strong> their<br />

thinking. Early societies did not have the ideation <strong>of</strong> spatial organization<br />

to allow them to do proper art perspectives. This was a developmental<br />

process. <strong>The</strong>re was a developmental process in the ideas <strong>of</strong> psychology<br />

and philosophy, in the idea <strong>of</strong> science, and in the concepts <strong>of</strong> religion<br />

and theology.<br />

Every form <strong>of</strong> human thought will evolve and change through the ages,<br />

just as medicine will evolve and change through the impact <strong>of</strong> this book<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!